BHF
Price
$52.99
Change
-$0.03 (-0.06%)
Updated
Sep 1 closing price
Capitalization
3.05B
70 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MFC
Price
$42.15
Change
-$0.26 (-0.61%)
Updated
Sep 1, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
70.1B
64 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BHF vs MFC

BHF vs MFC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BHF vs. MFC commentary
Sep 02, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHF is a Hold and MFC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 02, 2026
Stock price -- (BHF: $53.02 vs. MFC: $42.41)
Brand notoriety: BHF and MFC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BHF: 101% vs. MFC: 67%
Market capitalization -- BHF: $3.05B vs. MFC: $70.1B
BHF [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $3.05B. MFC’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $70.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $154.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $18.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BHF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMFC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MFC is a better buy in the long-term than BHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BHF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MFC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MFC is a better buy in the short-term than BHF.

Price Growth

BHF (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а +2.16% price change this week, while MFC (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was -0.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was -0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.05%.

Reported Earning Dates

BHF is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.

MFC is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (-0.38% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFC($70.1B) has a higher market cap than BHF($3.05B). MFC has higher P/E ratio than BHF: MFC (15.99) vs BHF (4.21). MFC YTD gains are higher at: 16.896 vs. BHF (-18.166). BHF has more cash in the bank: 87.4B vs. MFC (25B). BHF has less debt than MFC: BHF (3.15B) vs MFC (13.4B). MFC has higher revenues than BHF: MFC (53.2B) vs BHF (5.53B).
BHFMFCBHF / MFC
Capitalization3.05B70.1B4%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-18.16616.896-108%
P/E Ratio4.2115.9926%
Revenue5.53B53.2B10%
Total Cash87.4B25B350%
Total Debt3.15B13.4B24%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BHF vs MFC: Fundamental Ratings
BHF
MFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5055
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
706
SMR RATING
1..100
9397
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6345
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7027
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MFC's Valuation (34) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as BHF (35). This means that MFC’s stock grew similarly to BHF’s over the last 12 months.

MFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BHF (70). This means that MFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than BHF’s over the last 12 months.

BHF's SMR Rating (93) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MFC (97). This means that BHF’s stock grew similarly to MFC’s over the last 12 months.

MFC's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as BHF (63). This means that MFC’s stock grew similarly to BHF’s over the last 12 months.

MFC's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BHF (70). This means that MFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than BHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BHFMFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BHF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CHAI0.40N/A
N/A
Core AI Holdings Inc
XYLD41.48-0.04
-0.10%
Global X S&P 500® Covered Call ETF
AAUS61.51-0.16
-0.27%
Alpha Architect US Equity ETF
GTPE61.62-0.25
-0.41%
Goldman Sachs MSCI Wld Priv Eq RtTrkrETF
IAF13.32-0.15
-1.11%
abrdn Australia Equity Fund