BHF
Price
$46.96
Change
+$0.78 (+1.69%)
Updated
Aug 4 closing price
Capitalization
3.21B
93 days until earnings call
MFC
Price
$30.87
Change
+$0.42 (+1.38%)
Updated
Aug 4 closing price
Capitalization
44.61B
One day until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BHF vs MFC

Header iconBHF vs MFC Comparison
Open Charts BHF vs MFCBanner chart's image
Brighthouse Financial
Price$46.96
Change+$0.78 (+1.69%)
Volume$727.76K
Capitalization3.21B
Manulife Financial
Price$30.87
Change+$0.42 (+1.38%)
Volume$1.86M
Capitalization44.61B
BHF vs MFC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BHF vs. MFC commentary
Aug 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHF is a Buy and MFC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 05, 2025
Stock price -- (BHF: $46.96 vs. MFC: $30.87)
Brand notoriety: BHF and MFC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BHF: 86% vs. MFC: 59%
Market capitalization -- BHF: $3.21B vs. MFC: $44.61B
BHF [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $3.21B. MFC’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $44.61B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $133.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $24.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BHF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMFC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MFC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MFC is a better buy in the long-term than BHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BHF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MFC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BHF is a better buy in the short-term than MFC.

Price Growth

BHF (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а -3.55% price change this week, while MFC (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was -1.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +1.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

BHF is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

MFC is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (+1.03% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFC($44.6B) has a higher market cap than BHF($3.21B). MFC has higher P/E ratio than BHF: MFC (12.74) vs BHF (4.80). MFC YTD gains are higher at: 0.521 vs. BHF (-2.248). BHF has more cash in the bank: 86B vs. MFC (20.3B). BHF has less debt than MFC: BHF (3.16B) vs MFC (12.7B). MFC has higher revenues than BHF: MFC (42.3B) vs BHF (3.95B).
BHFMFCBHF / MFC
Capitalization3.21B44.6B7%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-2.2480.521-431%
P/E Ratio4.8012.7438%
Revenue3.95B42.3B9%
Total Cash86B20.3B424%
Total Debt3.16B12.7B25%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BHF vs MFC: Fundamental Ratings
BHF
MFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
667
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4412
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8556
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9539
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BHF's Valuation (50) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MFC (50). This means that BHF’s stock grew similarly to MFC’s over the last 12 months.

MFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as BHF (44). This means that MFC’s stock grew similarly to BHF’s over the last 12 months.

MFC's SMR Rating (100) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as BHF (100). This means that MFC’s stock grew similarly to BHF’s over the last 12 months.

MFC's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as BHF (85). This means that MFC’s stock grew similarly to BHF’s over the last 12 months.

MFC's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BHF (95). This means that MFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than BHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BHFMFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMIZ34.650.64
+1.89%
Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF
IXJ84.771.20
+1.44%
iShares Global Healthcare ETF
PCIG9.240.07
+0.78%
Polen Capital International Growth ETF
JANM31.970.11
+0.34%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Max Buffr ETF - Jan
BOIL32.36-3.52
-9.81%
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas

BHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BHF has been closely correlated with CNO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BHF jumps, then CNO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BHF
1D Price
Change %
BHF100%
+1.69%
CNO - BHF
74%
Closely correlated
-2.71%
PRU - BHF
74%
Closely correlated
+1.01%
MET - BHF
73%
Closely correlated
+1.11%
LNC - BHF
72%
Closely correlated
+2.85%
JXN - BHF
67%
Closely correlated
+0.74%
More

MFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFC has been closely correlated with MET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MFC jumps, then MET could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFC
1D Price
Change %
MFC100%
+1.38%
MET - MFC
74%
Closely correlated
+1.11%
PRU - MFC
73%
Closely correlated
+1.01%
PRI - MFC
70%
Closely correlated
+2.28%
LNC - MFC
68%
Closely correlated
+2.85%
BHF - MFC
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.69%
More