BHP
Price
$79.89
Change
+$1.31 (+1.67%)
Updated
Nov 6 closing price
Capitalization
203.04B
8 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NEXA
Price
$11.40
Change
+$0.09 (+0.80%)
Updated
Nov 6 closing price
Capitalization
1.51B
100 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BHP vs NEXA

BHP vs NEXA Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Oct 21, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? BHP Group (BHP) vs. Nexa Resources (NEXA) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • BHP is the world's largest listed diversified miner, weighted toward iron ore and copper, while NEXA is a mid-cap zinc producer with integrated mining and smelting operations in Brazil and Peru.
  • NEXA has delivered substantially stronger recent price momentum, rising more than 160% over the trailing year, while BHP has traded in a more stable, income-oriented range.
  • BHP's copper output fell 19% in its latest quarter on lower grades and disruptions, though it held full-year guidance and benefited from a 53% jump in realized copper prices.
  • NEXA's fundamentals have improved sharply, with adjusted EBITDA more than doubling in early 2026 and net leverage falling to roughly 1.40x.
  • BHP offers scale, diversification, and a dividend yield around 4%, whereas NEXA offers cyclical torque to zinc and silver but carries higher volatility and single-commodity concentration.

Introduction

Comparing BHP and NEXA places two very different mining business models side by side. BHP is a diversified, large-cap resources giant with heavy exposure to iron ore and copper, while Nexa Resources is a smaller, zinc-focused producer that also generates meaningful silver, lead, and copper by-product revenue. This stock comparison is most relevant to investors weighing stability and dividends against cyclical upside, and to traders assessing relative performance and market positioning within the metals and mining sector. Understanding how each company's earnings respond to commodity prices, operational execution, and corporate catalysts can help clarify which profile better suits a given portfolio objective.

BHP Overview and Recent Performance

BHP Group Limited operates large-scale iron ore, copper, and coal assets, primarily in Australia and Chile, and is advancing a potash project in Canada. In recent market activity, the stock has traded in a relatively measured range, reflecting its diversified cash-flow base and a dividend yield near 4%. Recent weeks brought a mixed operational update: first-quarter copper production fell 19% year over year to about 400,700 tonnes due to planned grade declines, scheduled maintenance, and weather-related disruptions, while iron ore output rose roughly 4%. Importantly, the company reaffirmed its full-year production guidance and benefited from a 53% year-over-year rise in realized copper prices. Sentiment has been shaped by a new chief executive, averted strike risk at the Escondida mine in Chile, and ongoing growth investments, even as safety incidents and cost pressures have tempered enthusiasm.

NEXA Overview and Recent Performance

NEXA, Nexa Resources S.A., is one of the world's largest zinc producers, running integrated mining and smelting operations in Brazil and Peru with significant by-product exposure to silver, lead, and copper. Its stock has been a standout performer, climbing more than 160% over the trailing year and roughly 58% year to date, driven by higher zinc prices and improving operations. Adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) more than doubled in the first quarter of 2026, and second-quarter net income reached $98 million as net leverage improved to about 1.40x. Catalysts in recent weeks include the recovery of its Cajamarquilla smelter after a fire, a reduction in the silver streaming share at Cerro Lindo from 65% to 25%, and public confirmation of acquisition discussions between controlling shareholder Votorantim and Swedish miner Boliden. These factors have supported a sharp re-rating, though the shares remain volatile.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates a select group of AI-driven trading bots from a broader universe of hundreds of automated strategies that collectively trade thousands of different tickers. Because each bot operates with its own trading style, timeframe, performance record, and basket of securities, only those best aligned with current market conditions earn a place in this rotating list. The platform surfaces key statistics such as win rates, trade frequency, and historical performance, helping users scan for strategies that match their risk tolerance and holding period. Whether you are focused on large-cap miners like BHP or more cyclical names like NEXA, exploring the Trending AI Robots section can offer a data-driven starting point for evaluating automated approaches in today's market.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The most significant contrast between these two names is scale and diversification. BHP spreads earnings across iron ore, copper, and coal, which dampens exposure to any single commodity but also limits cyclical torque; NEXA is far more concentrated in zinc, making it highly sensitive to zinc prices and treatment charges. On growth drivers, BHP is pivoting toward copper and potash for long-term structural demand, while Nexa is focused on operational recovery, mine-life extension, and the potential Boliden acquisition. Momentum clearly favors Nexa, whose shares have outperformed sharply, but that comes with higher volatility and elevated valuation-driven risk. By contrast, BHP offers relative stability and income but currently faces softer copper output and cost headwinds. Sector exposure also differs: BHP leans on steel-making bulk commodities and electrification metals, whereas Nexa's smelting segment adds industrial-processing risk alongside its mining operations.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors, Tickeron's AI would likely tilt toward NEXA on the strength of its superior recent trend consistency and momentum, supported by improving earnings, declining leverage, and an active corporate catalyst in the form of the Boliden discussions. At the same time, BHP presents a steadier, more diversified profile that may appeal to models prioritizing lower volatility and dividend durability. The AI's preference is probabilistic rather than definitive: NEXA's relative strength and catalysts currently stand out, but its higher volatility and single-commodity concentration introduce a different risk-reward balance that quantitative systems would weigh carefully against BHP's stability and scale.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
BHP vs. NEXA commentary
Nov 09, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHP is a StrongBuy and NEXA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
A.I.Advisor
a Summary for BHP with price predictions
Nov 06, 2026

BHP's RSI Oscillator ascends from oversold territory

The RSI Oscillator for BHP moved out of oversold territory on October 26, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 23 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 18 of the 23 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 78%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 45 of 60 cases where BHP's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 75%.

The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on November 05, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on BHP as a result. In 54 of 77 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 70%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for BHP just turned positive on November 06, 2026. Looking at past instances where BHP's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 39 of 52 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 75%.

Following a +6.10% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where BHP advanced for three days, in 216 of 327 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 66%.

BHP may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

Bearish Trend Analysis

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where BHP declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 57%.

The Aroon Indicator for BHP entered a downward trend on November 03, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 14 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 19 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 91, placing this stock better than average.

The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 37 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 53 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. BHP’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 66 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (4.108) is normal, around the industry mean (6.813). P/E Ratio (20.633) is within average values for comparable stocks, (-0.701). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.440) is also within normal values, averaging (1.026). BHP's Dividend Yield (0.099) is considerably higher than the industry average of (0.016). P/S Ratio (3.643) is also within normal values, averaging (283.864).

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 99 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

A.I.Advisor
a Summary for NEXA with price predictions
Nov 06, 2026

NEXA's RSI Oscillator ascending out of oversold territory

The RSI Indicator for NEXA moved out of oversold territory on October 23, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 28 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 23 of the 28 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 82%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 42 of 55 cases where NEXA's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 76%.

Following a +4.09% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where NEXA advanced for three days, in 224 of 300 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 75%.

NEXA may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on November 06, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on NEXA as a result. In 63 of 87 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 72%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for NEXA turned negative on October 22, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 53 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 37 of the 53 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 70%.

The 50-day moving average for NEXA moved below the 200-day moving average on October 30, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where NEXA declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 77%.

The Aroon Indicator for NEXA entered a downward trend on October 12, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 27 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.254) is normal, around the industry mean (6.813). P/E Ratio (5.455) is within average values for comparable stocks, (-0.701). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.060) is also within normal values, averaging (1.026). Dividend Yield (0.046) settles around the average of (0.016) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.462) is also within normal values, averaging (283.864).

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 36 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 49 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. NEXA’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 70 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. NEXA’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 91, placing this stock better than average.

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 93 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BHP vs NEXA: Fundamental Ratings
BHP
NEXA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1970
SMR RATING
1..100
9936
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5349
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1493
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
37n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NEXA's Valuation (27) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BHP (66). This means that NEXA’s stock grew somewhat faster than BHP’s over the last 12 months.

BHP's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NEXA (70). This means that BHP’s stock grew somewhat faster than NEXA’s over the last 12 months.

NEXA's SMR Rating (36) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BHP (99). This means that NEXA’s stock grew somewhat faster than BHP’s over the last 12 months.

NEXA's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as BHP (53). This means that NEXA’s stock grew similarly to BHP’s over the last 12 months.

BHP's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is significantly better than the same rating for NEXA (93). This means that BHP’s stock grew significantly faster than NEXA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BHPNEXA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 09, 2026
Stock price -- (BHP: $79.89 vs. NEXA: $11.40)
Brand notoriety: BHP: Notable vs. NEXA: Not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BHP: 96% vs. NEXA: 110%
Market capitalization -- BHP: $203.04B vs. NEXA: $1.51B
BHP [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $203.04B. NEXA’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $1.51B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $11 to $286.66B. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $7.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BHP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while NEXA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BHP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NEXA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NEXA is a better buy in the long-term than BHP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BHP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NEXA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BHP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • NEXA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BHP is a better buy in the short-term than NEXA.

Price Growth

BHP (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +0.92% price change this week, while NEXA (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +2.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -2.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -18.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was -47.44%.

Reported Earning Dates

BHP is expected to report earnings on Nov 17, 2026.

NEXA is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2027.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-2.91% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement

BHP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BHP has been closely correlated with RIO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BHP jumps, then RIO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BHP
1D Price
Change %
BHP100%
+1.67%
RIO - BHP
89%
Closely correlated
+0.69%
VALE - BHP
73%
Closely correlated
+1.22%
USAS - BHP
68%
Closely correlated
+4.75%
WRN - BHP
66%
Closely correlated
-3.25%
SKE - BHP
64%
Loosely correlated
+5.38%
More

NEXA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NEXA has been loosely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NEXA jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NEXA
1D Price
Change %
NEXA100%
+0.80%
BHP - NEXA
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.67%
RIO - NEXA
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.69%
WRN - NEXA
57%
Loosely correlated
-3.25%
SKE - NEXA
57%
Loosely correlated
+5.38%
VZLA - NEXA
53%
Loosely correlated
+3.45%
More
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AFYA10.500.35
+3.45%
Afya Limited
LFAC10.140.04
+0.40%
Leapfrog Acquisition Corp.
PRU119.24-3.22
-2.63%
Prudential Financial
VVV34.81-1.02
-2.85%
Valvoline
EHTH0.47-0.05
-8.85%
eHealth