Ad is loading...
BHYSX vs NCOAX
BHYSX vs NCOAX Comparison
Open Charts BHYSX vs NCOAX
BlackRock High Yield Port Svc
Price$6.95
Change+$0.03 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.01B
Nuveen High Yield Income A
Price$17.30
Change+$0.04 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets627.69M
BHYSX vs NCOAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BHYSX vs. NCOAX commentary
Apr 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHYSX is a Buy and NCOAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BHYSX has more cash in the bank: 25B vs. NCOAX (628M). NCOAX pays higher dividends than BHYSX: NCOAX (7.42) vs BHYSX (6.71). BHYSX was incepted earlier than NCOAX: BHYSX (26 years) vs NCOAX (15 years). NCOAX (1.08) is less costly to investors than BHYSX (0.87). NCOAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 181.00 vs. BHYSX (66.00). NCOAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BHYSX: NCOAX (2500) vs BHYSX (5000). BHYSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.23 vs. NCOAX (6.83). NCOAX (32.25) and BHYSX (32.17) have equivalent 5 years return.
| BHYSX | NCOAX | BHYSX / NCOAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.01 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.08 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.544 | -1.450 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 2500 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25B | 628M | 3,981% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.71 | 7.42 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.23 | 6.83 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.56 | 15.41 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.17 | 32.25 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.25 | 47.75 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...