Ad is loading...
BHYSX vs NCOAX
BHYSX vs NCOAX Comparison
Open Charts BHYSX vs NCOAX
BlackRock High Yield Port Svc
Price$7.11
Change+$0.01 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.95B
Nuveen High Yield Income A
Price$17.62
Change+$0.05 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets623.74M
BHYSX vs NCOAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BHYSX vs. NCOAX commentary
May 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHYSX is a Buy and NCOAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BHYSX has more cash in the bank: 25.9B vs. NCOAX (624M). NCOAX pays higher dividends than BHYSX: NCOAX (7.56) vs BHYSX (6.69). BHYSX was incepted earlier than NCOAX: BHYSX (27 years) vs NCOAX (15 years). NCOAX (1.08) is less costly to investors than BHYSX (0.87). NCOAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 181.00 vs. BHYSX (74.00). NCOAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BHYSX: NCOAX (2500) vs BHYSX (5000). BHYSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.24 vs. NCOAX (7.64). BHYSX (38.06) and NCOAX (37.41) have equivalent 5 years return.
| BHYSX | NCOAX | BHYSX / NCOAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.01 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.08 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.298 | 0.748 | 307% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 2500 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.9B | 624M | 4,151% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.69 | 7.56 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.24 | 7.64 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.36 | 23.25 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.06 | 37.41 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.95 | 50.32 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...