Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BHYSX vs NCOAX
BHYSX vs NCOAX Comparison
Open Charts BHYSX vs NCOAX
BlackRock High Yield Port Svc
Price$7.20
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.29B
Nuveen High Yield Income A
Price$17.80
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets626.84M
BHYSX vs NCOAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BHYSX vs. NCOAX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHYSX is a Buy and NCOAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BHYSX has more cash in the bank: 27.3B vs. NCOAX (627M). NCOAX pays higher dividends than BHYSX: NCOAX (7.46) vs BHYSX (6.47). BHYSX was incepted earlier than NCOAX: BHYSX (27 years) vs NCOAX (15 years). NCOAX (1.08) is less costly to investors than BHYSX (0.87). NCOAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 181.00 vs. BHYSX (74.00). NCOAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BHYSX: NCOAX (2500) vs BHYSX (5000). NCOAX (8.37) and BHYSX (8.29) have marching annual gain over last year. NCOAX return over 5 years is better than : 30.63 vs. BHYSX (29.13).
| BHYSX | NCOAX | BHYSX / NCOAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.01 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.08 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.712 | 3.402 | 139% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 2500 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.3B | 627M | 4,354% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.47 | 7.46 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.29 | 8.37 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.83 | 26.95 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.13 | 30.63 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.94 | 60.08 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers