Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIAWX vs CGFAX
BIAWX vs CGFAX Comparison
Open Charts BIAWX vs CGFAX
BIAWX vs CGFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIAWX vs. CGFAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIAWX is a Hold and CGFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. BIAWX (4.27B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than BIAWX: CGFAX (0.23) vs BIAWX (0.00). BIAWX was incepted earlier than CGFAX: BIAWX (14 years) vs CGFAX (24 years). BIAWX (0.75) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). BIAWX (32.00) and CGFAX (32.00) have comparable annual turnover. BIAWX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: BIAWX (100) vs CGFAX (250). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.97 vs. BIAWX (-14.50). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 18.99 vs. BIAWX (7.80).
| BIAWX | CGFAX | BIAWX / CGFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.62 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.62 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.442 | 8.708 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.27B | 361B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.23 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.50 | 11.97 | -121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.95 | 48.15 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.80 | 18.99 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 198.20 | 122.58 | 162% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement