Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIAWX vs CGFAX
BIAWX vs CGFAX Comparison
Open Charts BIAWX vs CGFAX
BIAWX vs CGFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIAWX vs. CGFAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIAWX is a Buy and CGFAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. BIAWX (4.29B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than BIAWX: CGFAX (0.24) vs BIAWX (0.00). BIAWX was incepted earlier than CGFAX: BIAWX (14 years) vs CGFAX (24 years). BIAWX (0.75) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). BIAWX (32.00) and CGFAX (32.00) have comparable annual turnover. BIAWX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: BIAWX (100) vs CGFAX (250). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.42 vs. BIAWX (-17.49). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.19 vs. BIAWX (2.17).
| BIAWX | CGFAX | BIAWX / CGFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.62 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.62 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.527 | 5.590 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.29B | 357B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.24 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.49 | 1.42 | -1,227% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.32 | 35.41 | 23% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.17 | 13.19 | 16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 186.07 | 103.59 | 180% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement