Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIBL vs RECS
BIBL vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts BIBL vs RECS
BIBL vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIBL vs. RECS commentary
Jul 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIBL is a Hold and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 5.9B vs. BIBL (489M). BIBL has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: BIBL (22.413) vs RECS (8.301). BIBL was incepted earlier than RECS: BIBL (9 years) vs RECS (7 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than BIBL (0.35). RECS has a higher turnover BIBL (19.00) vs BIBL (19.00).
| BIBL | RECS | BIBL / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 22.413 | 8.301 | 270% |
| Net Assets | 489M | 5.9B | 8% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.15 | 233% |
| Turnover | 19.00 | 32.00 | 59% |
| Yield | 0.89 | 0.75 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BIBL | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 12 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 66% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BIBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BIBL has been closely correlated with CAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BIBL jumps, then CAT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BIBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BIBL | 100% | -0.56% | ||
| CAT - BIBL | 77% Closely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| EMR - BIBL | 71% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| KEYS - BIBL | 70% Closely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| LSCC - BIBL | 69% Closely correlated | +0.59% | ||
| TER - BIBL | 69% Closely correlated | +0.02% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -0.94% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -1.06% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -9.47% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -1.82% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | -0.69% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.13% | ||
More | ||||