| BIBL | RECS | BIBL / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 20.621 | 10.455 | 197% |
| Net Assets | 487M | 6.05B | 8% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.15 | 233% |
| Turnover | 19.00 | 32.00 | 59% |
| Yield | 0.93 | 0.71 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 7 years | - |
| BIBL | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 18 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 76% | 5 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 88% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GMF | 156.99 | 0.99 | +0.63% |
| State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF (GMF) | |||
| GENW | 15.28 | N/A | N/A |
| Genter Capital International Dividend ETF (GENW) | |||
| OAKG | 26.89 | N/A | N/A |
| Oakmark Global Large Cap ETF (OAKG) | |||
| SFLR | 38.96 | -0.03 | -0.08% |
| Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR) | |||
| WEA | 10.07 | -0.02 | -0.20% |
| Western Asset Premier | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BIBL has been closely correlated with CAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BIBL jumps, then CAT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BIBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BIBL | 100% | +0.16% | ||
| CAT - BIBL | 80% Closely correlated | +1.30% | ||
| KEYS - BIBL | 71% Closely correlated | +1.07% | ||
| EMR - BIBL | 71% Closely correlated | +1.71% | ||
| NXPI - BIBL | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.02% | ||
| ADI - BIBL | 66% Loosely correlated | +3.60% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -0.24% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| LRCX - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | +6.98% | ||
| SEIC - RECS | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.33% | ||
More | ||||