Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BINC vs CRDT
BINC vs CRDT Comparison
Open Charts BINC vs CRDT
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
Price$53.37
Change+$0.02 (+0.04%)
Volume$4.01M
Net Assets12.05B
Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF
Price$23.85
Change-$0.07 (-0.29%)
Volume$19.68K
Net Assets88.26M
BINC vs CRDT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BINC vs. CRDT commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BINC is a Buy and CRDT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BINC has more net assets: 12.1B vs. CRDT (88.3M). BINC has a higher annual dividend yield than CRDT: BINC (6.307) vs CRDT (-0.603). BINC was incepted earlier than CRDT: BINC (2 years) vs CRDT (2 years). BINC (0.40) has a lower expense ratio than CRDT (1.48). CRDT has a higher turnover BINC (200.00) vs BINC (200.00).
| BINC | CRDT | BINC / CRDT | |
| Gain YTD | 6.307 | -0.603 | -1,045% |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 88.3M | 13,703% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.48 | 27% |
| Turnover | 200.00 | 322.00 | 62% |
| Yield | 6.25 | 7.20 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BINC | CRDT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 7% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 7% | 1 day ago 33% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 39% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 44% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 34% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | 1 day ago 44% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 9 days ago 56% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 35% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 8% | 1 day ago 23% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MLPX | 61.63 | 0.48 | +0.78% |
| Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | |||
| IGBH | 24.52 | 0.02 | +0.08% |
| iShares Interest Rate Hdg L/T Corp BdETF | |||
| DBJP | 85.18 | 0.02 | +0.03% |
| Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF | |||
| ITDI | 36.73 | -0.08 | -0.21% |
| iShares LifePath Target Date 2065 ETF | |||
| JXX | 28.16 | -0.21 | -0.74% |
| Janus Henderson Transformational Gr ETF | |||
CRDT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CRDT and QVCGP have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CRDT and QVCGP's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRDT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRDT | 100% | -0.29% | ||
| QVCGP - CRDT | 29% Poorly correlated | -4.52% | ||
| LUMN - CRDT | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.90% | ||
| QVCGA - CRDT | 8% Poorly correlated | -10.09% | ||
| FRO - CRDT | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.72% | ||
| OCSL - CRDT | -2% Poorly correlated | +0.68% | ||
More | ||||