FRO | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 44 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 3 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 28 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 66 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CRDT | FRO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 36% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 43% | 3 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 39% | 3 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 41% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 56% | 6 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 43% | 13 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 82% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CRDT and LUMN have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CRDT and LUMN's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRDT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRDT | 100% | -0.24% | ||
| LUMN - CRDT | 14% Poorly correlated | -1.16% | ||
| FRO - CRDT | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.25% | ||
| OCSL - CRDT | -2% Poorly correlated | -0.92% | ||
| SAR - CRDT | -4% Poorly correlated | -1.55% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRO has been closely correlated with DHT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRO jumps, then DHT could also see price increases.