BJ
Price
$91.04
Change
+$0.11 (+0.12%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
11.63B
67 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
COST
Price
$982.35
Change
+$6.66 (+0.68%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
435.65B
102 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BJ vs COST

Header iconBJ vs COST Comparison
Open Charts BJ vs COSTBanner chart's image
BJ vs COST Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BJ vs. COST commentary
Jun 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BJ is a Buy and COST is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 14, 2026
Stock price -- (BJ: $91.04 vs. COST: $982.35)
Brand notoriety: BJ: Not notable vs. COST: Notable
Both companies represent the Discount Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BJ: 61% vs. COST: 82%
Market capitalization -- BJ: $11.63B vs. COST: $435.65B
BJ [@Discount Stores] is valued at $11.63B. COST’s [@Discount Stores] market capitalization is $435.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Discount Stores] industry ranges from $963.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Discount Stores] industry is $170.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BJ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCOST’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BJ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • COST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, COST is a better buy in the long-term than BJ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BJ’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while COST’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BJ’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • COST’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BJ and COST are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BJ (@Discount Stores) experienced а +2.05% price change this week, while COST (@Discount Stores) price change was +1.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Discount Stores industry was +5.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

BJ is expected to report earnings on Aug 20, 2026.

COST is expected to report earnings on Sep 24, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Discount Stores (+5.67% weekly)

Companies in the discount stores industry specialize in offering substantial discounts on a vast array of retail products. Some companies in this industry also operate general merchandise warehouse clubs. Products sold at discount stores are typically similar to those of any department store, but the pricing of the goods is generally much lower (and hence the name “discount”). Think Dollar General Corporation, Dollar Tree, Inc. and Five Below, Inc. Many discount stores target low-income households and/or price-sensitive consumers as their potential market. Discount stores’ profitability could hinge on factors like competitive pricing, sufficient locations, healthy revenue per square foot, and effective advertisement. These store operators could have an edge over other retailers during financial crises or recessions, when many consumers could be looking for less expensive alternatives.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COST($436B) has a higher market cap than BJ($11.6B). COST has higher P/E ratio than BJ: COST (49.41) vs BJ (20.93). COST YTD gains are higher at: 14.238 vs. BJ (1.122). COST has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 14.5B vs. BJ (1.12B). COST has more cash in the bank: 20B vs. BJ (27.8M). BJ has less debt than COST: BJ (2.86B) vs COST (8.14B). COST has higher revenues than BJ: COST (294B) vs BJ (22B).
BJCOSTBJ / COST
Capitalization11.6B436B3%
EBITDA1.12B14.5B8%
Gain YTD1.12214.2388%
P/E Ratio20.9349.4142%
Revenue22B294B7%
Total Cash27.8M20B0%
Total Debt2.86B8.14B35%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BJ vs COST: Fundamental Ratings
BJ
COST
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1782
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4113
SMR RATING
1..100
3534
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7057
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7166
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BJ's Valuation (90) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as COST (100). This means that BJ’s stock grew similarly to COST’s over the last 12 months.

COST's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as BJ (41). This means that COST’s stock grew similarly to BJ’s over the last 12 months.

COST's SMR Rating (34) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as BJ (35). This means that COST’s stock grew similarly to BJ’s over the last 12 months.

COST's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as BJ (70). This means that COST’s stock grew similarly to BJ’s over the last 12 months.

COST's P/E Growth Rating (66) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as BJ (71). This means that COST’s stock grew similarly to BJ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BJCOST
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
38%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BJ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
COST
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FMS23.020.65
+2.91%
Fresenius Medical Care AG
MCRI129.021.37
+1.07%
Monarch Casino & Resort
XRX3.47N/A
N/A
Xerox Holdings Corp
DDT26.13-0.01
-0.04%
Dillard's Capital Trust I
IH1.38-0.03
-1.79%
iHuman

BJ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BJ has been loosely correlated with COST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BJ jumps, then COST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BJ
1D Price
Change %
BJ100%
+0.12%
COST - BJ
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.68%
WMT - BJ
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
OLLI - BJ
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.48%
PSMT - BJ
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
DG - BJ
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.40%
More

COST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COST has been loosely correlated with WMT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COST jumps, then WMT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COST
1D Price
Change %
COST100%
+0.68%
WMT - COST
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
BJ - COST
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
PSMT - COST
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
TGT - COST
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.95%
OLLI - COST
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
More