BKHPF
Price
$18.75
Change
-$1.64 (-8.04%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
11.78B
MZHOF
Price
$29.00
Change
-$1.30 (-4.29%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
43.65B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BKHPF vs MZHOF

Header iconBKHPF vs MZHOF Comparison
Open Charts BKHPF vs MZHOFBanner chart's image
Bank Hapoalim B.M
Price$18.75
Change-$1.64 (-8.04%)
Volume$105
Capitalization11.78B
Mizuho Financial Group
Price$29.00
Change-$1.30 (-4.29%)
Volume$140K
Capitalization43.65B
BKHPF vs MZHOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BKHPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MZHOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BKHPF vs. MZHOF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKHPF is a Hold and MZHOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BKHPF: $18.75 vs. MZHOF: $29.00)
Brand notoriety: BKHPF and MZHOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BKHPF: 6% vs. MZHOF: 640%
Market capitalization -- BKHPF: $11.78B vs. MZHOF: $43.65B
BKHPF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $11.78B. MZHOF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $43.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BKHPF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMZHOF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BKHPF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MZHOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BKHPF is a better buy in the long-term than MZHOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BKHPF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MZHOF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BKHPF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • MZHOF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MZHOF is a better buy in the short-term than BKHPF.

Price Growth

BKHPF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -8.04% price change this week, while MZHOF (@Regional Banks) price change was +5.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.16%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.49% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MZHOF($43.6B) has a higher market cap than BKHPF($11.8B). MZHOF has higher P/E ratio than BKHPF: MZHOF (9.73) vs BKHPF (6.13). BKHPF YTD gains are higher at: 96.130 vs. MZHOF (18.852). BKHPF has less debt than MZHOF: BKHPF (26.4B) vs MZHOF (19.6T). MZHOF has higher revenues than BKHPF: MZHOF (2.67T) vs BKHPF (19.4B).
BKHPFMZHOFBKHPF / MZHOF
Capitalization11.8B43.6B27%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD96.13018.852510%
P/E Ratio6.139.7363%
Revenue19.4B2.67T1%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt26.4B19.6T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BKHPF vs MZHOF: Fundamental Ratings
BKHPF
MZHOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9913
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
222
SMR RATING
1..100
31
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3645
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1659
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MZHOF's Valuation (55) in the null industry is in the same range as BKHPF (74). This means that MZHOF’s stock grew similarly to BKHPF’s over the last 12 months.

BKHPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as MZHOF (22). This means that BKHPF’s stock grew similarly to MZHOF’s over the last 12 months.

MZHOF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as BKHPF (3). This means that MZHOF’s stock grew similarly to BKHPF’s over the last 12 months.

BKHPF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as MZHOF (45). This means that BKHPF’s stock grew similarly to MZHOF’s over the last 12 months.

BKHPF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MZHOF (59). This means that BKHPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MZHOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BKHPFMZHOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
9%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BKHPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MZHOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UAUG38.150.04
+0.12%
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra BufferETFAug
MYCF25.070.01
+0.04%
SPDR SSGA My2026 Corporate Bond ETF
TAFL23.88N/A
N/A
AB Tax-Aware Long Municipal ETF
EFAV84.13-0.22
-0.26%
iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF
IXP113.19-0.49
-0.43%
iShares Global Comm Services ETF

BKHPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BKHPF and CHBAF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BKHPF and CHBAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BKHPF
1D Price
Change %
BKHPF100%
N/A
CHBAF - BKHPF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRARY - BKHPF
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.72%
CCRDF - BKHPF
23%
Poorly correlated
+5.97%
MZHOF - BKHPF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HMLN - BKHPF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MZHOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MZHOF and CCRDF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MZHOF and CCRDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MZHOF
1D Price
Change %
MZHOF100%
N/A
CCRDF - MZHOF
24%
Poorly correlated
+5.97%
FBPA - MZHOF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BNCDY - MZHOF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIBEY - MZHOF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.48%
ISTR - MZHOF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.73%
More