BKLC
Price
$49.14
Change
-$0.18 (-0.36%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Net Assets
5.77B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SPY
Price
$769.35
Change
-$1.75 (-0.23%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Net Assets
814.41B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BKLC vs SPY

BKLC vs SPY Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY)

Key Takeaways

  • Both BKLC and SPY provide passive exposure to approximately 500 large-capitalization U.S. equities, resulting in highly similar sector allocations dominated by information technology, financials, and health care.
  • BKLC offers a zero expense ratio while tracking the Solactive GBS United States 500 Index, delivering broad large-cap coverage at no cost to investors.
  • SPY tracks the S&P 500 Index with an expense ratio of approximately 0.09 percent and benefits from exceptional liquidity as one of the most actively traded ETFs.
  • Structural differences are minimal in holdings overlap and sector weights, but BKLC’s fee advantage can compound meaningfully over long holding periods.
  • Both funds exhibit comparable volatility profiles driven by concentration in mega-cap technology names and sensitivity to interest-rate expectations and earnings growth cycles.
  • Positioning favors cost-conscious, long-term investors seeking core U.S. equity exposure without sacrificing diversification or liquidity.

Introduction

Investors evaluating core U.S. large-cap exposure often compare BKLC and SPY because both deliver diversified baskets of the largest American companies through low-cost, passive vehicles. Although the funds pursue nearly identical objectives, differences in expense structure, index methodology, and trading characteristics create meaningful distinctions for portfolio construction. This comparison examines their structural features, sector profiles, and relative positioning within the current large-cap equity environment to help investors determine suitability for long-term holdings.

BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) Overview

The BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) is a passively managed fund that seeks to track the Solactive GBS United States 500 Index. The index comprises approximately 500 of the largest U.S. companies selected and weighted by market capitalization. The ETF holds roughly 500 securities with top positions typically including NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, and Meta. Sector allocations mirror broad market weights, with the largest exposures in information technology (around 30-33 percent), followed by financials and health care. The fund charges a total expense ratio of 0.00 percent and employs full replication with low turnover. As a standard equity ETF, it offers straightforward daily liquidity and transparent holdings.

SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) Overview

The SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is a unit investment trust that seeks to replicate the performance of the S&P 500 Index before expenses. The index includes approximately 500 large-cap U.S. companies chosen by a committee based on market size, liquidity, and industry representation. The fund holds a similar number of securities with nearly identical top holdings such as NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, and Meta. Sector breakdowns closely align with market-cap weights, led by information technology. The gross expense ratio stands at approximately 0.09 percent. SPY maintains extremely high trading volume and tight bid-ask spreads, making it one of the most liquid equity ETFs available.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The large-cap U.S. equity segment remains influenced by artificial-intelligence adoption, earnings growth among technology leaders, and evolving interest-rate expectations. Capital continues to flow toward companies with strong balance sheets and pricing power, supporting concentration in mega-cap names across both funds. Regulatory developments around technology competition and potential shifts in monetary policy represent ongoing macro drivers. Sector risks include valuation compression if growth slows or if broader economic data signals reduced corporate profitability. These factors affect relative performance dynamics without altering the core diversified nature of either ETF.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, both ETFs have delivered returns closely aligned with large-cap benchmarks, with modest divergences attributable to slight index differences and the impact of fees. BKLC’s zero expense ratio provides a small but persistent performance edge over longer periods. SPY offers superior intraday liquidity for tactical adjustments. Relative positioning reflects shared exposure to technology-driven earnings momentum and sensitivity to macroeconomic data releases. Volatility characteristics remain comparable, with both funds exhibiting lower tracking error than actively managed alternatives due to their passive replication strategies.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. AI Screener

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI would currently favor BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) with moderate probability. The zero expense ratio, combined with near-identical diversification and holdings overlap relative to SPY, supports a structural cost advantage that compounds over multi-year horizons. Comparable sector momentum and liquidity profiles make the fee differential the decisive observable factor in relative positioning.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
BKLC vs. SPY commentary
Aug 30, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKLC is a Hold and SPY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPY has more net assets: 814B vs. BKLC (5.77B). BKLC has a higher annual dividend yield than SPY: BKLC (14.153) vs SPY (13.421). BKLC was incepted earlier than SPY: BKLC (6 years) vs SPY (34 years). BKLC (0.00) has a lower expense ratio than SPY (0.09). SPY has a higher turnover BKLC (2.10) vs BKLC (2.10).
BKLCSPYBKLC / SPY
Gain YTD14.15313.421105%
Net Assets5.77B814B1%
Total Expense Ratio0.000.09-
Turnover2.103.0070%
Yield1.061.01105%
Fund Existence6 years34 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BKLCSPY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BKLC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SPY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DUST32.362.33
+7.76%
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X ETF
DSTL70.010.07
+0.10%
Distillate US Fdmtl Stblty & Val ETF
BTOT48.90-0.16
-0.34%
iShares Total USD Fixed Income MarketETF
XSVN46.42-0.19
-0.41%
BondBloxx Bloomberg SevenYrTrgDurUSTrETF
GRNJ29.06-0.95
-3.17%
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small & Mid Cap ETF

BKLC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BKLC has been closely correlated with AAPL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BKLC jumps, then AAPL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BKLC
1D Price
Change %
BKLC100%
-0.36%
AAPL - BKLC
69%
Closely correlated
+1.63%
BLK - BKLC
68%
Closely correlated
-0.26%
APH - BKLC
67%
Closely correlated
-2.26%
MCO - BKLC
66%
Closely correlated
+1.16%
TEL - BKLC
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
More