Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BKMBX vs FASCX
BKMBX vs FASCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BKMBX vs. FASCX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKMBX is a Hold and FASCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKMBX has more cash in the bank: 8B vs. FASCX (534M). FASCX pays higher dividends than BKMBX: FASCX (4.97) vs BKMBX (4.05). BKMBX was incepted earlier than FASCX: BKMBX (5 years) vs FASCX (12 years). FASCX (3.53) is less costly to investors than BKMBX (0.82). FASCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 266.59 vs. BKMBX (242.00). FASCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BKMBX: FASCX (1000) vs BKMBX (5000000). FASCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.04 vs. BKMBX (1.83). BKMBX return over 5 years is better than : 19.14 vs. FASCX (3.56).
| BKMBX | FASCX | BKMBX / FASCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 3.19 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 3.53 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.973 | 6.357 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 1000 | 500,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8B | 534M | 1,498% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.05 | 4.97 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.83 | 3.04 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.79 | 12.87 | 161% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.14 | 3.56 | 538% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 12.21 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers