BKPKF
Price
$53.63
Change
+$1.82 (+3.51%)
Updated
Oct 28 closing price
Capitalization
13.88B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GGAL
Price
$49.71
Change
-$1.18 (-2.32%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.75B
5 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BKPKF vs GGAL

Header iconBKPKF vs GGAL Comparison
Open Charts BKPKF vs GGALBanner chart's image
Bank Polska Kasa Opieki
Price$53.63
Change+$1.82 (+3.51%)
Volume$114
Capitalization13.88B
Grupo Financiero Galicia SA
Price$49.71
Change-$1.18 (-2.32%)
Volume$16.46K
Capitalization8.75B
BKPKF vs GGAL Comparison Chart in %
BKPKF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GGAL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BKPKF vs. GGAL commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKPKF is a Hold and GGAL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (BKPKF: $53.63 vs. GGAL: $49.71)
Brand notoriety: BKPKF and GGAL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BKPKF: 100% vs. GGAL: 51%
Market capitalization -- BKPKF: $13.88B vs. GGAL: $8.75B
BKPKF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $13.88B. GGAL’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $8.75B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $172.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BKPKF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileGGAL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BKPKF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • GGAL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BKPKF is a better buy in the long-term than GGAL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BKPKF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GGAL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BKPKF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • GGAL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BKPKF is a better buy in the short-term than GGAL.

Price Growth

BKPKF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GGAL (@Regional Banks) price change was -10.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

GGAL is expected to report earnings on Nov 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.96% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKPKF($13.9B) has a higher market cap than GGAL($8.76B). BKPKF (7.56) and GGAL (7.39) have similar P/E ratio . BKPKF YTD gains are higher at: 71.836 vs. GGAL (-18.745). GGAL has higher revenues than BKPKF: GGAL (6.46T) vs BKPKF (17.4B).
BKPKFGGALBKPKF / GGAL
Capitalization13.9B8.76B159%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD71.836-18.745-383%
P/E Ratio7.567.39102%
Revenue17.4B6.46T0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt26.7BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BKPKF vs GGAL: Fundamental Ratings
BKPKF
GGAL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4584
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3844
SMR RATING
1..100
41
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4840
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3198
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BKPKF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is in the same range as GGAL (40) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BKPKF’s stock grew similarly to GGAL’s over the last 12 months.

BKPKF's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as GGAL (44) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BKPKF’s stock grew similarly to GGAL’s over the last 12 months.

GGAL's SMR Rating (1) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BKPKF (4) in the null industry. This means that GGAL’s stock grew similarly to BKPKF’s over the last 12 months.

GGAL's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BKPKF (48) in the null industry. This means that GGAL’s stock grew similarly to BKPKF’s over the last 12 months.

BKPKF's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GGAL (98) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BKPKF’s stock grew significantly faster than GGAL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BKPKFGGAL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BKPKF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GGAL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
FOREX / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EURUSD1.16N/A
N/A
Euro - United States Dollar
AUDCHF0.52N/A
N/A
Australian Dollar - Switzerland Franc
CHFHKD9.73N/A
N/A
Switzerland Franc - Hong Kong Dollar
JPYCAD0.01N/A
N/A
Japan Yen - Canadian Dollar
XAUUSD4075.92N/A
N/A
Gold Ounce - United States Dollar

BKPKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BKPKF and BMA have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BKPKF and BMA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BKPKF
1D Price
Change %
BKPKF100%
N/A
BMA - BKPKF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
GGAL - BKPKF
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.32%
MCBK - BKPKF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SUPV - BKPKF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.28%
BBAR - BKPKF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
More

GGAL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GGAL has been closely correlated with BMA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 95% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GGAL jumps, then BMA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGAL
1D Price
Change %
GGAL100%
-2.32%
BMA - GGAL
95%
Closely correlated
+0.76%
BBAR - GGAL
94%
Closely correlated
+0.13%
SUPV - GGAL
93%
Closely correlated
-0.28%
DB - GGAL
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.50%
SBNY - GGAL
40%
Loosely correlated
-8.33%
More