BLMN
Price
$7.43
Change
+$0.19 (+2.62%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
615.9M
20 days until earnings call
DIN
Price
$28.05
Change
+$0.71 (+2.60%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
420.47M
25 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLMN vs DIN

Header iconBLMN vs DIN Comparison
Open Charts BLMN vs DINBanner chart's image
Bloomin' Brands
Price$7.43
Change+$0.19 (+2.62%)
Volume$2.39M
Capitalization615.9M
Dine Brands Global
Price$28.05
Change+$0.71 (+2.60%)
Volume$472.95K
Capitalization420.47M
BLMN vs DIN Comparison Chart in %
BLMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLMN vs. DIN commentary
Oct 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLMN is a Hold and DIN is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 04, 2025
Stock price -- (BLMN: $7.43 vs. DIN: $28.05)
Brand notoriety: BLMN and DIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLMN: 93% vs. DIN: 87%
Market capitalization -- BLMN: $615.9M vs. DIN: $420.47M
BLMN [@Restaurants] is valued at $615.9M. DIN’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $420.47M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $214B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLMN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileDIN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BLMN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • DIN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, DIN is a better buy in the long-term than BLMN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLMN’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DIN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLMN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • DIN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DIN is a better buy in the short-term than BLMN.

Price Growth

BLMN (@Restaurants) experienced а +2.62% price change this week, while DIN (@Restaurants) price change was +15.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +1.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLMN is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

DIN is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+1.36% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLMN($616M) has a higher market cap than DIN($420M). DIN has higher P/E ratio than BLMN: DIN (9.14) vs BLMN (8.13). DIN YTD gains are higher at: -0.942 vs. BLMN (-35.692). BLMN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 290M vs. DIN (178M). DIN has less debt than BLMN: DIN (1.64B) vs BLMN (2.16B). BLMN has higher revenues than DIN: BLMN (3.93B) vs DIN (845M).
BLMNDINBLMN / DIN
Capitalization616M420M147%
EBITDA290M178M163%
Gain YTD-35.692-0.9423,787%
P/E Ratio8.139.1489%
Revenue3.93B845M466%
Total Cash50.3MN/A-
Total Debt2.16B1.64B132%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLMN vs DIN: Fundamental Ratings
BLMN
DIN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
917
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
92100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6448
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10010
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BLMN's Valuation (3) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DIN (4). This means that BLMN’s stock grew similarly to DIN’s over the last 12 months.

BLMN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DIN (100). This means that BLMN’s stock grew similarly to DIN’s over the last 12 months.

BLMN's SMR Rating (92) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DIN (100). This means that BLMN’s stock grew similarly to DIN’s over the last 12 months.

DIN's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as BLMN (64). This means that DIN’s stock grew similarly to BLMN’s over the last 12 months.

DIN's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for BLMN (100). This means that DIN’s stock grew significantly faster than BLMN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLMNDIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ITHIX46.66N/A
N/A
Hartford Capital Appreciation I
SPGIX47.27N/A
N/A
SEI Large Cap Growth I (SIMT)
RSPMX28.25N/A
N/A
Victory RS Partners Member
ASEFX16.19N/A
N/A
Nuveen Small Cap Select R6
TSGDX17.90N/A
N/A
Transamerica Sustainable Growth Eq A

BLMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLMN has been loosely correlated with DIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BLMN jumps, then DIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLMN
1D Price
Change %
BLMN100%
+2.62%
DIN - BLMN
63%
Loosely correlated
+2.60%
BJRI - BLMN
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.31%
CAKE - BLMN
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.60%
CBRL - BLMN
52%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FRSH - BLMN
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.74%
More

DIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DIN has been closely correlated with CBRL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DIN jumps, then CBRL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DIN
1D Price
Change %
DIN100%
+2.60%
CBRL - DIN
70%
Closely correlated
N/A
BLMN - DIN
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.62%
BJRI - DIN
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.31%
CAKE - DIN
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.60%
DENN - DIN
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.93%
More