BLMN
Price
$6.88
Change
-$0.22 (-3.10%)
Updated
Dec 1 closing price
Capitalization
586.29M
72 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SHAK
Price
$86.92
Change
+$0.80 (+0.93%)
Updated
Dec 2, 10:43 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.47B
72 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLMN vs SHAK

Header iconBLMN vs SHAK Comparison
Open Charts BLMN vs SHAKBanner chart's image
Bloomin' Brands
Price$6.88
Change-$0.22 (-3.10%)
Volume$2.24M
Capitalization586.29M
Shake Shack
Price$86.92
Change+$0.80 (+0.93%)
Volume$844
Capitalization3.47B
BLMN vs SHAK Comparison Chart in %
BLMN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SHAK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLMN vs. SHAK commentary
Dec 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLMN is a Buy and SHAK is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 02, 2025
Stock price -- (BLMN: $6.88 vs. SHAK: $86.12)
Brand notoriety: BLMN: Not notable vs. SHAK: Notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLMN: 105% vs. SHAK: 132%
Market capitalization -- BLMN: $586.29M vs. SHAK: $3.47B
BLMN [@Restaurants] is valued at $586.29M. SHAK’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $3.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $216.19B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLMN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSHAK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BLMN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SHAK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BLMN is a better buy in the long-term than SHAK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLMN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHAK’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLMN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SHAK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SHAK is a better buy in the short-term than BLMN.

Price Growth

BLMN (@Restaurants) experienced а +8.01% price change this week, while SHAK (@Restaurants) price change was -0.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +3.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.93%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLMN is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

SHAK is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+3.29% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHAK($3.47B) has a higher market cap than BLMN($586M). SHAK has higher P/E ratio than BLMN: SHAK (84.43) vs BLMN (19.19). SHAK YTD gains are higher at: -33.652 vs. BLMN (-40.452). BLMN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 290M vs. SHAK (174M). SHAK has more cash in the bank: 358M vs. BLMN (50.3M). SHAK has less debt than BLMN: SHAK (854M) vs BLMN (2.16B). BLMN has higher revenues than SHAK: BLMN (3.93B) vs SHAK (1.37B).
BLMNSHAKBLMN / SHAK
Capitalization586M3.47B17%
EBITDA290M174M167%
Gain YTD-40.452-33.652120%
P/E Ratio19.1984.4323%
Revenue3.93B1.37B287%
Total Cash50.3M358M14%
Total Debt2.16B854M253%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLMN vs SHAK: Fundamental Ratings
BLMN
SHAK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6474
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10083
SMR RATING
1..100
8671
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7681
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BLMN's Valuation (4) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for SHAK (95). This means that BLMN’s stock grew significantly faster than SHAK’s over the last 12 months.

SHAK's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as BLMN (100). This means that SHAK’s stock grew similarly to BLMN’s over the last 12 months.

SHAK's SMR Rating (71) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as BLMN (86). This means that SHAK’s stock grew similarly to BLMN’s over the last 12 months.

BLMN's Price Growth Rating (76) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as SHAK (81). This means that BLMN’s stock grew similarly to SHAK’s over the last 12 months.

BLMN's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for SHAK (100). This means that BLMN’s stock grew significantly faster than SHAK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLMNSHAK
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLMN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SHAK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPMCX8.44N/A
N/A
Saratoga Mid Capitalization C
JBAWX32.88N/A
N/A
JHancock Balanced R6
GAUIX5.90N/A
N/A
Gabelli Utilities I
BUFDX34.86N/A
N/A
Buffalo Growth & Income
JFCCX36.01N/A
N/A
JHancock Fundamental All Cap Core C

BLMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLMN has been closely correlated with DIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BLMN jumps, then DIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLMN
1D Price
Change %
BLMN100%
-3.10%
DIN - BLMN
67%
Closely correlated
-3.52%
CAKE - BLMN
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
BJRI - BLMN
53%
Loosely correlated
-2.87%
CBRL - BLMN
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.90%
FRSH - BLMN
50%
Loosely correlated
-2.39%
More

SHAK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHAK has been loosely correlated with CAKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SHAK jumps, then CAKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHAK
1D Price
Change %
SHAK100%
-1.55%
CAKE - SHAK
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
FRSH - SHAK
57%
Loosely correlated
-2.39%
KRUS - SHAK
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
CAVA - SHAK
54%
Loosely correlated
+4.34%
TXRH - SHAK
54%
Loosely correlated
-2.48%
More