BLOK
Price
$66.78
Change
+$1.08 (+1.64%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Net Assets
1.26B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
STCE
Price
$78.95
Change
+$1.73 (+2.24%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Net Assets
304.9M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLOK vs STCE

BLOK vs STCE Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK) vs. Schwab Crypto Thematic ETF (STCE)

Key Takeaways

  • Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK) is an actively managed fund targeting blockchain technology companies, while Schwab Crypto Thematic ETF (STCE) is a passively managed fund tracking an index of companies benefiting from cryptocurrencies and blockchain.
  • BLOK maintains approximately 53 holdings with an expense ratio of 0.70%, offering broader active selection across blockchain applications; STCE holds about 42 securities at a lower expense ratio of 0.30%.
  • Both ETFs provide exposure to the digital assets and blockchain theme but differ in management style, cost structure, and concentration, with STCE showing higher top-10 weighting in recent periods.
  • Sector allocations for both center on technology and financial services, reflecting the overlap in companies involved in crypto mining, trading platforms, and distributed ledger technology.
  • Liquidity profiles favor established thematic ETFs in this niche, though investors should evaluate trading volume and bid-ask spreads as part of broader portfolio considerations.
  • Structural differences position BLOK for potential outperformance through manager discretion and STCE for cost-efficient, rules-based replication of crypto-related themes.

Introduction

Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK) and Schwab Crypto Thematic ETF (STCE) both target the intersection of blockchain technology and digital assets, making them relevant for investors seeking thematic exposure in this evolving sector. They do not compete directly as identical products but offer alternative strategies within the same broad theme: one through active management and the other via passive index tracking. This comparison highlights their structural distinctions to help investors assess which approach aligns with specific objectives around diversification, costs, and thematic conviction.

Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK) Overview

Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK) is an actively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks total return by investing at least 80% of its assets in equity securities of companies involved in the development and utilization of blockchain technologies. The fund typically holds around 53 securities and employs an active strategy that dynamically adjusts allocations based on industry trends and company fundamentals. Top holdings often include firms such as those in crypto mining and digital platforms, with the top 10 representing a meaningful but diversified portion of assets. Sector exposure concentrates in technology and financial services. The expense ratio stands at 0.70%. As an actively managed thematic product, BLOK distinguishes itself through portfolio manager discretion rather than strict index replication.

Schwab Crypto Thematic ETF (STCE) Overview

Schwab Crypto Thematic ETF (STCE) is a passively managed fund designed to track the Schwab Crypto Thematic Index, which provides global exposure to companies that may benefit from the development or utilization of cryptocurrencies and blockchain or distributed ledger technology. The ETF typically holds approximately 42 securities. Top holdings feature companies engaged in crypto mining, trading, and related infrastructure, with the top 10 often accounting for a significant share of assets. Sector allocations emphasize technology and financial services. The expense ratio is 0.30%. As a rules-based, index-tracking product, STCE offers a lower-cost, transparent approach to crypto-themed equity exposure without active intervention.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The blockchain and digital assets sector continues to evolve amid regulatory developments, institutional adoption, and macroeconomic influences such as interest rate environments and technological innovation cycles. Capital flows into crypto-related equities have fluctuated with broader market sentiment, while catalysts include advancements in decentralized finance applications and enterprise blockchain use cases. Risks encompass regulatory uncertainty, volatility in underlying digital assets, and competition among technology providers. Both ETFs operate within this dynamic landscape, where sector rotation and earnings from key infrastructure companies influence overall thematic performance.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, the active management of Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK) has allowed flexibility in responding to shifts in blockchain adoption and company-specific developments, potentially leading to differentiated returns relative to broader indices. Schwab Crypto Thematic ETF (STCE), with its passive structure and lower costs, has tracked the underlying index closely, reflecting momentum in crypto infrastructure firms during periods of sector strength. Relative positioning shows STCE with greater concentration in top holdings, which can amplify moves tied to leading crypto miners or platforms, while BLOK’s broader active selection may moderate volatility through diversification. Both have exhibited sensitivity to interest rate expectations and commodity trends affecting mining operations.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into thematic ETFs like those in blockchain may find the tool particularly useful for refining strategies.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including lower expense ratio, rules-based consistency, and efficient exposure to the crypto thematic index, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to Schwab Crypto Thematic ETF (STCE) for cost-conscious investors prioritizing structural efficiency and broad thematic replication. Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK) may appeal in scenarios favoring active oversight and potentially wider diversification across blockchain applications. This assessment reflects relative strengths in cost structure and positioning without constituting investment advice.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
BLOK vs. STCE commentary
Jun 22, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLOK is a Hold and STCE is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLOK has more net assets: 1.26B vs. STCE (305M). STCE has a higher annual dividend yield than BLOK: STCE (31.671) vs BLOK (17.384). BLOK was incepted earlier than STCE: BLOK (8 years) vs STCE (4 years). STCE (0.30) has a lower expense ratio than BLOK (0.70). STCE has a higher turnover BLOK (50.00) vs BLOK (50.00).
BLOKSTCEBLOK / STCE
Gain YTD17.38431.67155%
Net Assets1.26B305M414%
Total Expense Ratio0.700.30233%
Turnover50.0060.0083%
Yield0.601.4641%
Fund Existence8 years4 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLOKSTCE
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLOK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
STCE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EIEAX42.230.51
+1.22%
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Eq Aset Allc I
TRSPX80.520.86
+1.08%
Nuveen S&P 500 Index Retire
CIVGX21.510.20
+0.94%
American Funds International Vntg 529-F2
IRVSX30.960.20
+0.65%
Voya Russell Large Cap Value Idx Port S
HRLSX10.64-0.06
-0.56%
Hartford Real Asset R4

STCE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STCE has been closely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if STCE jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STCE
1D Price
Change %
STCE100%
+2.24%
CLSK - STCE
86%
Closely correlated
+2.74%
RIOT - STCE
84%
Closely correlated
+2.44%
CIFR - STCE
84%
Closely correlated
+10.74%
HUT - STCE
84%
Closely correlated
+4.68%
MARA - STCE
81%
Closely correlated
+2.16%
More