Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BLRAX vs CSFAX
BLRAX vs CSFAX Comparison
Open Charts BLRAX vs CSFAX
BLRAX vs CSFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BLRAX vs. CSFAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLRAX is a Buy and CSFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFAX has more cash in the bank: 2.32B vs. BLRAX (120M). CSFAX pays higher dividends than BLRAX: CSFAX (2.94) vs BLRAX (2.65). BLRAX was incepted earlier than CSFAX: BLRAX (14 years) vs CSFAX (22 years). BLRAX (1.62) is less costly to investors than CSFAX (1.19). BLRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 130.00 vs. CSFAX (57.00). BLRAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CSFAX (5%) vs CSFAX (5%). CSFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BLRAX: CSFAX (0) vs BLRAX (1000). BLRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.38 vs. CSFAX (10.13). CSFAX return over 5 years is better than : 5.00 vs. BLRAX (1.84).
| BLRAX | CSFAX | BLRAX / CSFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.19 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.62 | 1.19 | 136% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.925 | 6.305 | 110% |
| Front Load | 5% | 5% | 106% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 120M | 2.32B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.65 | 2.94 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.38 | 10.13 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.88 | 27.37 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.84 | 5.00 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.02 | 47.34 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers