BLWYF
Price
$31.44
Change
-$1.24 (-3.79%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
3.77B
IBP
Price
$244.72
Change
-$4.73 (-1.90%)
Updated
Sep 30, 01:09 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.76B
37 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLWYF vs IBP

Header iconBLWYF vs IBP Comparison
Open Charts BLWYF vs IBPBanner chart's image
Bellway
Price$31.44
Change-$1.24 (-3.79%)
Volume$691
Capitalization3.77B
Installed Building Products
Price$244.72
Change-$4.73 (-1.90%)
Volume$400
Capitalization6.76B
BLWYF vs IBP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BLWYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLWYF vs. IBP commentary
Sep 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLWYF is a Buy and IBP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 30, 2025
Stock price -- (BLWYF: $32.28 vs. IBP: $249.45)
Brand notoriety: BLWYF and IBP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Homebuilding industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLWYF: 116% vs. IBP: 62%
Market capitalization -- BLWYF: $3.77B vs. IBP: $6.76B
BLWYF [@Homebuilding] is valued at $3.77B. IBP’s [@Homebuilding] market capitalization is $6.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Homebuilding] industry ranges from $49.85B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Homebuilding] industry is $6.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLWYF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileIBP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BLWYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • IBP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, IBP is a better buy in the long-term than BLWYF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLWYF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IBP’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLWYF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • IBP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BLWYF is a better buy in the short-term than IBP.

Price Growth

BLWYF (@Homebuilding) experienced а +2.68% price change this week, while IBP (@Homebuilding) price change was -2.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Homebuilding industry was -0.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

IBP is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Homebuilding (-0.46% weekly)

Homebuilding includes companies residential home construction companies, renovators and repair firms. The companies may be building single-family or multifamily homes, condominiums or mobile homes. Over the five years to 2019, the Home Builders industry is estimated to have grown at an annualized rate of 2.5% to reach $89.4 billion, (including expected growth of 2.6% in 2019), according to a study by IbisWorld. After having suffered one of its worst crises a decade ago during the last macroeconomic recession–which had much of its origins in U.S. real estate – the homebuilding industry has been recovering steadily so far. Higher disposable incomes and improving economic activity have bolstered consumers’ purchases of homes. While revenue of the Home Builders industry remains well below its prerecession high, demand growth estimates show promise.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IBP($6.76B) has a higher market cap than BLWYF($3.77B). IBP has higher P/E ratio than BLWYF: IBP (27.75) vs BLWYF (19.61). IBP YTD gains are higher at: 44.621 vs. BLWYF (-21.268). IBP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 511M vs. BLWYF (248M). BLWYF has more cash in the bank: 122M vs. IBP (90.4M). BLWYF has less debt than IBP: BLWYF (130M) vs IBP (983M). IBP has higher revenues than BLWYF: IBP (2.96B) vs BLWYF (2.54B).
BLWYFIBPBLWYF / IBP
Capitalization3.77B6.76B56%
EBITDA248M511M49%
Gain YTD-21.26844.621-48%
P/E Ratio19.6127.7571%
Revenue2.54B2.96B86%
Total Cash122M90.4M135%
Total Debt130M983M13%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLWYF vs IBP: Fundamental Ratings
BLWYF
IBP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4863
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9432
SMR RATING
1..100
9125
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6346
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2644
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BLWYF's Valuation (27) in the null industry is in the same range as IBP (40) in the Building Products industry. This means that BLWYF’s stock grew similarly to IBP’s over the last 12 months.

IBP's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLWYF (94) in the null industry. This means that IBP’s stock grew somewhat faster than BLWYF’s over the last 12 months.

IBP's SMR Rating (25) in the Building Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for BLWYF (91) in the null industry. This means that IBP’s stock grew significantly faster than BLWYF’s over the last 12 months.

IBP's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as BLWYF (63) in the null industry. This means that IBP’s stock grew similarly to BLWYF’s over the last 12 months.

BLWYF's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is in the same range as IBP (44) in the Building Products industry. This means that BLWYF’s stock grew similarly to IBP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLWYFIBP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
19%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
15%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
20%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
18%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
19%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
24%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLWYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IBBFX14.850.03
+0.20%
Thrivent Dynamic Allocation S
AEGFX63.54N/A
N/A
American Funds EUPAC F1
TIEUX15.99N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Pathway Intl Eq
ECFGX24.94N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opps C
ESPCX32.22N/A
N/A
Allspring Special Small Cap Value C

BLWYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BLWYF and TMHC have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BLWYF and TMHC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLWYF
1D Price
Change %
BLWYF100%
+2.68%
TMHC - BLWYF
13%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
LGIH - BLWYF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.54%
IBP - BLWYF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.11%
TPH - BLWYF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.77%
DHI - BLWYF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.57%
More

IBP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IBP has been closely correlated with TMHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IBP jumps, then TMHC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IBP
1D Price
Change %
IBP100%
+0.11%
TMHC - IBP
75%
Closely correlated
+0.29%
TOL - IBP
74%
Closely correlated
+0.77%
PHM - IBP
73%
Closely correlated
+1.52%
KBH - IBP
72%
Closely correlated
+1.36%
MTH - IBP
71%
Closely correlated
+0.54%
More