BLWYF
Price
$35.78
Change
-$5.22 (-12.73%)
Updated
May 14 closing price
Capitalization
3.43B
TMHC
Price
$63.45
Change
-$1.48 (-2.28%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
6.51B
19 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLWYF vs TMHC

Header iconBLWYF vs TMHC Comparison
Open Charts BLWYF vs TMHCBanner chart's image
Bellway
Price$35.78
Change-$5.22 (-12.73%)
Volume$2.5K
Capitalization3.43B
Taylor Morrison Home
Price$63.45
Change-$1.48 (-2.28%)
Volume$992.67K
Capitalization6.51B
BLWYF vs TMHC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BLWYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TMHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLWYF vs. TMHC commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLWYF is a Hold and TMHC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (BLWYF: $35.78 vs. TMHC: $63.45)
Brand notoriety: BLWYF and TMHC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Homebuilding industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLWYF: 125% vs. TMHC: 105%
Market capitalization -- BLWYF: $3.43B vs. TMHC: $6.51B
BLWYF [@Homebuilding] is valued at $3.43B. TMHC’s [@Homebuilding] market capitalization is $6.51B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Homebuilding] industry ranges from $53.71B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Homebuilding] industry is $7.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLWYF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTMHC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BLWYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TMHC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TMHC is a better buy in the long-term than BLWYF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLWYF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TMHC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLWYF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • TMHC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TMHC is a better buy in the short-term than BLWYF.

Price Growth

BLWYF (@Homebuilding) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TMHC (@Homebuilding) price change was +4.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Homebuilding industry was +0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

TMHC is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Homebuilding (+0.60% weekly)

Homebuilding includes companies residential home construction companies, renovators and repair firms. The companies may be building single-family or multifamily homes, condominiums or mobile homes. Over the five years to 2019, the Home Builders industry is estimated to have grown at an annualized rate of 2.5% to reach $89.4 billion, (including expected growth of 2.6% in 2019), according to a study by IbisWorld. After having suffered one of its worst crises a decade ago during the last macroeconomic recession–which had much of its origins in U.S. real estate – the homebuilding industry has been recovering steadily so far. Higher disposable incomes and improving economic activity have bolstered consumers’ purchases of homes. While revenue of the Home Builders industry remains well below its prerecession high, demand growth estimates show promise.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TMHC($6.51B) has a higher market cap than BLWYF($3.43B). BLWYF has higher P/E ratio than TMHC: BLWYF (11.64) vs TMHC (8.77). TMHC YTD gains are higher at: 3.660 vs. BLWYF (-12.732). TMHC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.12B vs. BLWYF (330M). TMHC has more cash in the bank: 799M vs. BLWYF (422M). BLWYF has less debt than TMHC: BLWYF (130M) vs TMHC (2.1B). TMHC has higher revenues than BLWYF: TMHC (7.42B) vs BLWYF (3.57B).
BLWYFTMHCBLWYF / TMHC
Capitalization3.43B6.51B53%
EBITDA330M1.12B30%
Gain YTD-12.7323.660-348%
P/E Ratio11.648.77133%
Revenue3.57B7.42B48%
Total Cash422M799M53%
Total Debt130M2.1B6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLWYF vs TMHC: Fundamental Ratings
BLWYF
TMHC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5027
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8018
SMR RATING
1..100
9053
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6245
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1663
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BLWYF's Valuation (35) in the null industry is in the same range as TMHC (66) in the Homebuilding industry. This means that BLWYF’s stock grew similarly to TMHC’s over the last 12 months.

TMHC's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Homebuilding industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLWYF (80) in the null industry. This means that TMHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than BLWYF’s over the last 12 months.

TMHC's SMR Rating (53) in the Homebuilding industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLWYF (90) in the null industry. This means that TMHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than BLWYF’s over the last 12 months.

TMHC's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as BLWYF (62) in the null industry. This means that TMHC’s stock grew similarly to BLWYF’s over the last 12 months.

BLWYF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TMHC (63) in the Homebuilding industry. This means that BLWYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TMHC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLWYFTMHC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
20%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
19%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
19%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
13%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLWYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TMHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CSPAX71.930.41
+0.57%
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
RPRCX8.340.04
+0.48%
Royce Premier Consult
IBSAX19.53N/A
N/A
VY® Baron Growth A
SPSCX19.80N/A
N/A
Sterling Capital Behav Sm Cp Val Eq Intl
FOCSX17.73N/A
N/A
Fidelity Small Cap Growth K6

BLWYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BLWYF and TMHC have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BLWYF and TMHC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLWYF
1D Price
Change %
BLWYF100%
N/A
TMHC - BLWYF
13%
Poorly correlated
-2.28%
LGIH - BLWYF
8%
Poorly correlated
-3.85%
IBP - BLWYF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.47%
TPH - BLWYF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.93%
DHI - BLWYF
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.74%
More

TMHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMHC has been closely correlated with MTH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TMHC jumps, then MTH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TMHC
1D Price
Change %
TMHC100%
-2.28%
MTH - TMHC
91%
Closely correlated
-2.74%
KBH - TMHC
90%
Closely correlated
-2.85%
PHM - TMHC
90%
Closely correlated
-1.78%
MHO - TMHC
89%
Closely correlated
-2.24%
CCS - TMHC
87%
Closely correlated
-2.26%
More