BMGL
Price
$6.88
Change
-$0.53 (-7.15%)
Updated
Jun 23, 03:58 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
11.6M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PACS
Price
$37.55
Change
-$0.21 (-0.56%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:14 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.98B
55 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BMGL vs PACS

BMGL vs PACS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BMGL vs. PACS commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMGL is a Hold and PACS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 24, 2026
Stock price -- (BMGL: $7.41 vs. PACS: $37.77)
Brand notoriety: BMGL and PACS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Hospital/Nursing Management industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BMGL: 2% vs. PACS: 99%
Market capitalization -- BMGL: $11.6M vs. PACS: $5.98B
BMGL [@Hospital/Nursing Management] is valued at $11.6M. PACS’s [@Hospital/Nursing Management] market capitalization is $5.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hospital/Nursing Management] industry ranges from $83.63B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Hospital/Nursing Management] industry is $4.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BMGL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePACS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BMGL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PACS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PACS is a better buy in the long-term than BMGL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BMGL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PACS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BMGL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PACS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PACS is a better buy in the short-term than BMGL.

Price Growth

BMGL (@Hospital/Nursing Management) experienced а +1.42% price change this week, while PACS (@Hospital/Nursing Management) price change was +4.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hospital/Nursing Management industry was -0.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

PACS is expected to report earnings on Aug 17, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hospital/Nursing Management (-0.10% weekly)

Hospital/Nursing Management companies own and operate health care facilities. Their operations include nursing homes, acute care facilities, retirement centers and outpatient surgery centers. HCA Healthcare Inc., Alcon Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. are some major companies in this industry. Technology has been at the forefront of development of advanced solutions, including quicker diagnoses of complex conditions. Investments in new diagnostics, healthcare IoT, and other healthcare technologies continue to gather momentum in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PACS($5.98B) has a higher market cap than BMGL($11.6M). BMGL has higher P/E ratio than PACS: BMGL (155.24) vs PACS (24.37). BMGL YTD gains are higher at: 26.049 vs. PACS (-1.615). PACS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 444M vs. BMGL (-9.67M). PACS has higher revenues than BMGL: PACS (5.43B) vs BMGL (11.3M).
BMGLPACSBMGL / PACS
Capitalization11.6M5.98B0%
EBITDA-9.67M444M-2%
Gain YTD26.049-1.615-1,613%
P/E Ratio155.2424.37637%
Revenue11.3M5.43B0%
Total CashN/A248M-
Total DebtN/A3.37B-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BMGLPACS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BMGL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PACS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FBCV39.260.03
+0.08%
Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF
WABF24.88-0.04
-0.16%
Western Asset Bond ETF
VV343.63-1.37
-0.40%
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
GGN4.95-0.03
-0.60%
GAMCO Global Gold Natural Resources & Income Trust
CFND3.42-0.03
-0.87%
C1 Fund Inc

BMGL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BMGL and ASTH have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BMGL and ASTH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMGL
1D Price
Change %
BMGL100%
+0.09%
ASTH - BMGL
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.00%
CON - BMGL
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.25%
ARDT - BMGL
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.35%
AUNA - BMGL
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.53%
PACS - BMGL
1%
Poorly correlated
+3.22%
More

PACS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PACS and ENSG have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PACS and ENSG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PACS
1D Price
Change %
PACS100%
+3.22%
ENSG - PACS
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.04%
EHC - PACS
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.66%
OPCH - PACS
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.16%
THC - PACS
24%
Poorly correlated
+3.58%
SRTA - PACS
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.21%
More