Advertisement
BMR vs BULL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMR is a Hold and BULL is a Hold.
| BMR | BULL | BMR / BULL | |
| Capitalization | 19.3M | 4.15B | 0% |
| EBITDA | -6.79M | 80.5M | -8% |
| Gain YTD | -21.656 | -1.030 | 2,103% |
| P/E Ratio | 4.41 | 12.61 | 35% |
| Revenue | 2.91M | 681M | 0% |
| Total Cash | 7.74M | 925M | 1% |
| Total Debt | 151K | 78.7M | 0% |
| BMR | BULL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 14% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 23% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 18% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 52% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 34% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 83% | 28 days ago 45% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 22% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 25% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BMR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while BULL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- BMR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- BULL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BMR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BULL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BMR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- BULL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
BMR (@Packaged Software) experienced а -7.52% price change this week, while BULL (@Packaged Software) price change was -18.37% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.91%.
Reported Earning Dates
BULL is expected to report earnings on Nov 19, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+0.20% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TWM | 23.25 | 0.21 | +0.91% |
| ProShares UltraShort Russell2000 | |||
| QBIV | 27.16 | N/A | N/A |
| AllianzIM International Equity Bfr5 ETF | |||
| JHMB | 21.20 | -0.02 | -0.09% |
| JHancock Mortgage Backed Sec ETF | |||
| IBTL | 19.60 | -0.02 | -0.10% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Tr ETF | |||
| ACWX | 75.74 | -0.19 | -0.25% |
| iShares MSCI ACWI ex US ETF | |||
BMR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BMR has been loosely correlated with BULL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BMR jumps, then BULL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BMR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMR | 100% | -0.81% | ||
| BULL - BMR | 49% Loosely correlated | -11.20% | ||
| SOUN - BMR | 49% Loosely correlated | -3.58% | ||
| HOLO - BMR | 46% Loosely correlated | +2.60% | ||
| INTZ - BMR | 45% Loosely correlated | -3.85% | ||
| REKR - BMR | 43% Loosely correlated | -2.26% | ||
More | ||||
BULL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BULL has been loosely correlated with MSTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BULL jumps, then MSTR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BULL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BULL | 100% | -11.20% | ||
| MSTR - BULL | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.64% | ||
| SOUN - BULL | 54% Loosely correlated | -3.58% | ||
| HOLO - BULL | 50% Loosely correlated | +2.60% | ||
| PHUN - BULL | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.25% | ||
| BMR - BULL | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.81% | ||
More | ||||