Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BMSRX vs FSMAX
BMSRX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts BMSRX vs FSMAX
BMSRX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BMSRX vs. FSMAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMSRX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. BMSRX (3.12B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than BMSRX: FSMAX (0.50) vs BMSRX (0.38). BMSRX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: BMSRX (10 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). BMSRX (1.67) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). BMSRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). BMSRX (0) and FSMAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.57 vs. BMSRX (18.95). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. BMSRX (11.40).
| BMSRX | FSMAX | BMSRX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.04 | 4,543% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 0.04 | 4,771% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.349 | 13.370 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.12B | 40.1B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.38 | 0.50 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.95 | 20.57 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.60 | 55.83 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.40 | 33.18 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 133.82 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement