BN
Price
$66.51
Change
-$0.05 (-0.08%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
99.94B
68 days until earnings call
CIXXF
Price
$23.17
Change
-$0.08 (-0.34%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
3.33B
61 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BN vs CIXXF

Header iconBN vs CIXXF Comparison
Open Charts BN vs CIXXFBanner chart's image
Brookfield
Price$66.51
Change-$0.05 (-0.08%)
Volume$1.2M
Capitalization99.94B
CI Financial
Price$23.17
Change-$0.08 (-0.34%)
Volume$1.97K
Capitalization3.33B
BN vs CIXXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CIXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BN vs. CIXXF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BN is a StrongBuy and CIXXF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BN: $66.51 vs. CIXXF: $23.17)
Brand notoriety: BN and CIXXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BN: 46% vs. CIXXF: 9%
Market capitalization -- BN: $99.94B vs. CIXXF: $3.33B
BN [@Investment Managers] is valued at $99.94B. CIXXF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $3.33B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BN’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileCIXXF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • CIXXF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BN is a better buy in the long-term than CIXXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CIXXF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CIXXF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CIXXF is a better buy in the short-term than BN.

Price Growth

BN (@Investment Managers) experienced а +1.20% price change this week, while CIXXF (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

BN is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

CIXXF is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BN($99.9B) has a higher market cap than CIXXF($3.33B). CIXXF has higher P/E ratio than BN: CIXXF (493.35) vs BN (151.16). BN YTD gains are higher at: 16.161 vs. CIXXF (7.603). BN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 30.3B vs. CIXXF (382M). BN has more cash in the bank: 22.9B vs. CIXXF (193M). CIXXF has less debt than BN: CIXXF (4.62B) vs BN (251B). BN has higher revenues than CIXXF: BN (76.1B) vs CIXXF (3.53B).
BNCIXXFBN / CIXXF
Capitalization99.9B3.33B3,000%
EBITDA30.3B382M7,932%
Gain YTD16.1617.603213%
P/E Ratio151.16493.3531%
Revenue76.1B3.53B2,155%
Total Cash22.9B193M11,865%
Total Debt251B4.62B5,429%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BN vs CIXXF: Fundamental Ratings
BN
CIXXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6124
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2161
SMR RATING
1..100
9097
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4646
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
111
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CIXXF's Valuation (28) in the null industry is in the same range as BN (33) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that CIXXF’s stock grew similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CIXXF (61) in the null industry. This means that BN’s stock grew somewhat faster than CIXXF’s over the last 12 months.

BN's SMR Rating (90) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as CIXXF (97) in the null industry. This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to CIXXF’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as CIXXF (46) in the null industry. This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to CIXXF’s over the last 12 months.

CIXXF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as BN (11) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that CIXXF’s stock grew similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNCIXXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
65%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CIXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IJK96.680.53
+0.55%
iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF
UFIV49.560.13
+0.26%
F/m US Treasury 5 Year Note ETF
PBOC28.390.07
+0.25%
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - Oct
BANX21.110.05
+0.24%
ArrowMark Financial Corp
PPH89.03N/A
N/A
VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF

BN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BN has been closely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BN jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BN
1D Price
Change %
BN100%
-0.08%
BAM - BN
84%
Closely correlated
-1.25%
JHG - BN
81%
Closely correlated
-1.82%
KKR - BN
81%
Closely correlated
-1.33%
BX - BN
80%
Closely correlated
+0.05%
APO - BN
79%
Closely correlated
-2.38%
More

CIXXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIXXF has been loosely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CIXXF jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIXXF
1D Price
Change %
CIXXF100%
N/A
BN - CIXXF
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
VCTR - CIXXF
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.19%
MAIN - CIXXF
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
APAM - CIXXF
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.47%
CNS - CIXXF
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
More