BN
Price
$58.18
Change
+$0.60 (+1.04%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
62.67B
25 days until earnings call
GBLBF
Price
$66.96
Change
+$0.50 (+0.75%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
11.08B
Ad is loading...

BN vs GBLBF

Header iconBN vs GBLBF Comparison
Open Charts BN vs GBLBFBanner chart's image
Brookfield
Price$58.18
Change+$0.60 (+1.04%)
Volume$1.41M
Capitalization62.67B
Groupe Bruxelles Lambert SA
Price$66.96
Change+$0.50 (+0.75%)
Volume$38.08K
Capitalization11.08B
BN vs GBLBF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GBLBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BN vs. GBLBF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BN is a Hold and GBLBF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (BN: $58.18 vs. GBLBF: $66.96)
Brand notoriety: BN and GBLBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BN: 66% vs. GBLBF: 1409%
Market capitalization -- BN: $62.67B vs. GBLBF: $11.08B
BN [@Investment Managers] is valued at $62.67B. GBLBF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $11.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGBLBF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GBLBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BN is a better buy in the long-term than GBLBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GBLBF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GBLBF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BN is a better buy in the short-term than GBLBF.

Price Growth

BN (@Investment Managers) experienced а +5.96% price change this week, while GBLBF (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

BN is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.49% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BN($62.7B) has a higher market cap than GBLBF($11.1B). BN has higher P/E ratio than GBLBF: BN (67.52) vs GBLBF (47.39). BN YTD gains are higher at: 1.271 vs. GBLBF (-1.239). BN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 30.7B vs. GBLBF (676M). BN has more cash in the bank: 16.9B vs. GBLBF (3.3B). GBLBF has less debt than BN: GBLBF (7.81B) vs BN (234B). BN has higher revenues than GBLBF: BN (95.9B) vs GBLBF (9B).
BNGBLBFBN / GBLBF
Capitalization62.7B11.1B565%
EBITDA30.7B676M4,541%
Gain YTD1.271-1.239-103%
P/E Ratio67.5247.39142%
Revenue95.9B9B1,066%
Total Cash16.9B3.3B512%
Total Debt234B7.81B2,998%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BN vs GBLBF: Fundamental Ratings
BN
GBLBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4150
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
22100
SMR RATING
1..100
8867
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4276
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
112
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GBLBF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BN (72) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that GBLBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BN’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for GBLBF (100) in the null industry. This means that BN’s stock grew significantly faster than GBLBF’s over the last 12 months.

GBLBF's SMR Rating (67) in the null industry is in the same range as BN (88) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that GBLBF’s stock grew similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GBLBF (76) in the null industry. This means that BN’s stock grew somewhat faster than GBLBF’s over the last 12 months.

GBLBF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as BN (11) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that GBLBF’s stock grew similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNGBLBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
87%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
38%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
70%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
64%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GBLBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GGOAX12.790.10
+0.79%
Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Growth A
TLVAX23.310.16
+0.69%
Timothy Plan Large/Mid Cap Value A
OIEQX24.770.17
+0.69%
JPMorgan Equity Income R4
FVDKX36.750.18
+0.49%
Fidelity Value Discovery K
EIPFX18.730.08
+0.43%
EIP Growth and Income Investor

BN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BN has been closely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BN jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BN
1D Price
Change %
BN100%
+1.04%
BAM - BN
80%
Closely correlated
+0.96%
BX - BN
72%
Closely correlated
+1.83%
JHG - BN
69%
Closely correlated
+1.83%
APAM - BN
67%
Closely correlated
+0.92%
TROW - BN
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
More

GBLBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GBLBF and VRTS have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GBLBF and VRTS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GBLBF
1D Price
Change %
GBLBF100%
+0.75%
VRTS - GBLBF
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
JHG - GBLBF
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.83%
AMP - GBLBF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
BBUC - GBLBF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.06%
BN - GBLBF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.04%
More