Advertisement
BNCDY vs MZHOF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNCDY is a StrongBuy and MZHOF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BNCDY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMZHOF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- BNCDY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- MZHOF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BNCDY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MZHOF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BNCDY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- MZHOF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
BNCDY (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.23% price change this week, while MZHOF (@Regional Banks) price change was -6.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.15%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (+0.44% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| BNCDY | MZHOF | BNCDY / MZHOF | |
| Capitalization | 14.8B | 81.6B | 18% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 78.205 | 27.459 | 285% |
| P/E Ratio | 11.22 | 13.08 | 86% |
| Revenue | 2.45B | 3.61T | 0% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 393M | 22.19T | 0% |
BNCDY | MZHOF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 95 | 90 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 68 Overvalued | 69 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 5 | 19 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 12 | 1 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 25 | 30 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BNCDY's Valuation (68) in the null industry is in the same range as MZHOF (69). This means that BNCDY’s stock grew similarly to MZHOF’s over the last 12 months.
BNCDY's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as MZHOF (19). This means that BNCDY’s stock grew similarly to MZHOF’s over the last 12 months.
MZHOF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as BNCDY (12). This means that MZHOF’s stock grew similarly to BNCDY’s over the last 12 months.
BNCDY's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as MZHOF (45). This means that BNCDY’s stock grew similarly to MZHOF’s over the last 12 months.
BNCDY's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the null industry is in the same range as MZHOF (30). This means that BNCDY’s stock grew similarly to MZHOF’s over the last 12 months.
| BNCDY | MZHOF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 23% | 1 day ago 33% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 36% | 1 day ago 41% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 26% | 1 day ago 17% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 31% | 1 day ago 30% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 35% | 1 day ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 14% | 20 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 17 days ago 32% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 50% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 34% | 1 day ago 51% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GYLD | 13.56 | 0.26 | +1.92% |
| Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF | |||
| IBMP | 25.48 | 0.04 | +0.14% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bd ETF | |||
| TEMX | 27.66 | N/A | N/A |
| Touchstone Sands Cap EM ex-China Gr ETF | |||
| IJT | 141.39 | -0.07 | -0.05% |
| iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF | |||
| SVAL | 34.22 | -0.04 | -0.11% |
| iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF | |||
BNCDY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BNCDY and RSNHF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BNCDY and RSNHF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BNCDY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BNCDY | 100% | -1.59% | ||
| RSNHF - BNCDY | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MZHOF - BNCDY | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CDAB - BNCDY | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| KMERF - BNCDY | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BLMIF - BNCDY | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
MZHOF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MZHOF and CCRDF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MZHOF and CCRDF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MZHOF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MZHOF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CCRDF - MZHOF | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FBPA - MZHOF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BNCDY - MZHOF | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.59% | ||
| CIBEY - MZHOF | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.59% | ||
| ISTR - MZHOF | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.03% | ||
More | ||||