BNT
Price
$49.59
Change
+$0.75 (+1.54%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
5.01B
17 days until earnings call
IFCZF
Price
$211.88
Change
+$2.84 (+1.36%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
25.76B
Ad is loading...

BNT vs IFCZF

Header iconBNT vs IFCZF Comparison
Open Charts BNT vs IFCZFBanner chart's image
Brookfield Wealth Solutions
Price$49.59
Change+$0.75 (+1.54%)
Volume$15.68K
Capitalization5.01B
Intact Financial
Price$211.88
Change+$2.84 (+1.36%)
Volume$16.32K
Capitalization25.76B
BNT vs IFCZF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BNT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNT vs. IFCZF commentary
Apr 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNT is a Hold and IFCZF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 19, 2025
Stock price -- (BNT: $49.59 vs. IFCZF: $211.88)
Brand notoriety: BNT and IFCZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNT: 77% vs. IFCZF: 1%
Market capitalization -- BNT: $5.01B vs. IFCZF: $25.76B
BNT [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $5.01B. IFCZF’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $25.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $121.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $14.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIFCZF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BNT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IFCZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IFCZF is a better buy in the long-term than BNT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BNT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

BNT (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +5.67% price change this week, while IFCZF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +7.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +2.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

BNT is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+2.77% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IFCZF($25.8B) has a higher market cap than BNT($5.01B). IFCZF has higher P/E ratio than BNT: IFCZF (15.20) vs BNT (3.91). IFCZF YTD gains are higher at: 16.303 vs. BNT (-13.507). BNT has less debt than IFCZF: BNT (2.91B) vs IFCZF (5.43B). IFCZF has higher revenues than BNT: IFCZF (21.2B) vs BNT (6.94B).
BNTIFCZFBNT / IFCZF
Capitalization5.01B25.8B19%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-13.50716.303-83%
P/E Ratio3.9115.2026%
Revenue6.94B21.2B33%
Total CashN/A15.8B-
Total Debt2.91B5.43B54%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IFCZF: Fundamental Ratings
IFCZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
65
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
74
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BNT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EASG30.640.38
+1.26%
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Selection Eq ETF
BOTZ26.620.11
+0.41%
Global X Robotics & Artfcl Intllgnc ETF
MUI12.05N/A
N/A
BlackRock Municipal Income Fund
SPMV44.44N/A
N/A
Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF
GRX9.40-0.01
-0.10%
Gabelli Healthcare & Wellness Trust (The)

BNT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BNT has been loosely correlated with RGA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BNT jumps, then RGA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNT
1D Price
Change %
BNT100%
+1.54%
RGA - BNT
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.15%
L - BNT
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
MKL - BNT
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.30%
GLRE - BNT
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.51%
CINF - BNT
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
More

IFCZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IFCZF has been loosely correlated with PLMR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IFCZF jumps, then PLMR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IFCZF
1D Price
Change %
IFCZF100%
+1.36%
PLMR - IFCZF
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.43%
UFCS - IFCZF
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
FRFHF - IFCZF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
MCY - IFCZF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.17%
BNT - IFCZF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.54%
More