BNT
Price
$66.58
Change
-$0.15 (-0.22%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
18.97B
61 days until earnings call
IFCZF
Price
$201.10
Change
+$1.21 (+0.61%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
35.98B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BNT vs IFCZF

Header iconBNT vs IFCZF Comparison
Open Charts BNT vs IFCZFBanner chart's image
Brookfield Wealth Solutions
Price$66.58
Change-$0.15 (-0.22%)
Volume$35.49K
Capitalization18.97B
Intact Financial
Price$201.10
Change+$1.21 (+0.61%)
Volume$104
Capitalization35.98B
BNT vs IFCZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BNT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IFCZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNT vs. IFCZF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNT is a Buy and IFCZF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BNT: $66.58 vs. IFCZF: $201.10)
Brand notoriety: BNT and IFCZF are both not notable
BNT represents the Multi-Line Insurance, while IFCZF is part of the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNT: 301% vs. IFCZF: 1%
Market capitalization -- BNT: $18.97B vs. IFCZF: $35.98B
BNT [@Multi-Line Insurance] is valued at $18.97B. IFCZF’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $35.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $143B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $31.89B. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIFCZF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BNT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IFCZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BNT is a better buy in the long-term than IFCZF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IFCZF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BNT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • IFCZF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IFCZF is a better buy in the short-term than BNT.

Price Growth

BNT (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а +1.14% price change this week, while IFCZF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +0.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was -1.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.81%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

BNT is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Multi-Line Insurance (-1.00% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.22% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IFCZF($36B) has a higher market cap than BNT($19B). IFCZF has higher P/E ratio than BNT: IFCZF (21.29) vs BNT (10.83). BNT YTD gains are higher at: 16.303 vs. IFCZF (10.385). BNT has more cash in the bank: 30.8B vs. IFCZF (19.5B). BNT has less debt than IFCZF: BNT (4.71B) vs IFCZF (5.43B). IFCZF has higher revenues than BNT: IFCZF (24.7B) vs BNT (14.2B).
BNTIFCZFBNT / IFCZF
Capitalization19B36B53%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD16.30310.385157%
P/E Ratio10.8321.2951%
Revenue14.2B24.7B57%
Total Cash30.8B19.5B158%
Total Debt4.71B5.43B87%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IFCZF: Fundamental Ratings
IFCZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
13
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
14

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNTIFCZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
25%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
49%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
28%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
8%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BNT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IFCZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EMIF25.420.49
+1.95%
iShares Emerging Markets Infras ETF
TDF11.210.11
+0.99%
Templeton Dragon Fund
TLTP22.590.16
+0.73%
Amplify Bloomberg U.S.Trs 12% Prm IncETF
SMMD73.600.44
+0.60%
iShares Russell 2500 ETF
MAYW32.740.03
+0.09%
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cp Buffer20 May ETF

IFCZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IFCZF has been loosely correlated with PLMR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IFCZF jumps, then PLMR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IFCZF
1D Price
Change %
IFCZF100%
+0.61%
PLMR - IFCZF
34%
Loosely correlated
-2.40%
UFCS - IFCZF
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.98%
FRFHF - IFCZF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.68%
MCY - IFCZF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.84%
BNT - IFCZF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.22%
More