BNT
Price
$65.43
Change
+$0.56 (+0.86%)
Updated
Aug 26, 04:57 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
18.61B
72 days until earnings call
QBIEY
Price
$13.66
Change
-$0.42 (-2.98%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
20.72B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BNT vs QBIEY

Header iconBNT vs QBIEY Comparison
Open Charts BNT vs QBIEYBanner chart's image
Brookfield Wealth Solutions
Price$65.43
Change+$0.56 (+0.86%)
Volume$100
Capitalization18.61B
QBE Insurance Group
Price$13.66
Change-$0.42 (-2.98%)
Volume$39.73K
Capitalization20.72B
BNT vs QBIEY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BNT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QBIEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNT vs. QBIEY commentary
Aug 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNT is a StrongBuy and QBIEY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BNT: $64.87 vs. QBIEY: $13.66)
Brand notoriety: BNT and QBIEY are both not notable
BNT represents the Multi-Line Insurance, while QBIEY is part of the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNT: 78% vs. QBIEY: 145%
Market capitalization -- BNT: $18.61B vs. QBIEY: $20.72B
BNT [@Multi-Line Insurance] is valued at $18.61B. QBIEY’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $20.72B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $144.27B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $33.45B. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQBIEY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BNT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • QBIEY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, QBIEY is a better buy in the long-term than BNT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QBIEY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BNT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • QBIEY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QBIEY is a better buy in the short-term than BNT.

Price Growth

BNT (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а -0.51% price change this week, while QBIEY (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -0.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was +0.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.45%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +1.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.51%.

Reported Earning Dates

BNT is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Multi-Line Insurance (+0.03% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+1.56% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QBIEY($20.7B) has a higher market cap than BNT($18.6B). BNT (10.62) and QBIEY (10.34) have similar P/E ratio . QBIEY YTD gains are higher at: 20.492 vs. BNT (13.316). QBIEY has less debt than BNT: QBIEY (2.9B) vs BNT (4.71B). QBIEY has higher revenues than BNT: QBIEY (19.2B) vs BNT (14.2B).
BNTQBIEYBNT / QBIEY
Capitalization18.6B20.7B90%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD13.31620.49265%
P/E Ratio10.6210.34103%
Revenue14.2B19.2B74%
Total Cash30.8BN/A-
Total Debt4.71B2.9B163%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QBIEY: Fundamental Ratings
QBIEY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
76
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
14
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
36
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNTQBIEY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BNT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QBIEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
USL36.550.44
+1.23%
United States 12 Month Oil
DHF2.570.02
+0.78%
BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund
LIAT135.60N/A
N/A
LifeX 2059 Infl-Prt Longevity Inc ETF
XLV136.20-1.97
-1.43%
The Health Care Select Sector SPDR® ETF
CONL31.89-3.01
-8.62%
GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF

BNT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BNT has been loosely correlated with L. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BNT jumps, then L could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNT
1D Price
Change %
BNT100%
-1.47%
L - BNT
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.67%
MKL - BNT
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
AEG - BNT
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.38%
CINF - BNT
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.34%
KMPR - BNT
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.31%
More

QBIEY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QBIEY and BNT have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QBIEY and BNT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QBIEY
1D Price
Change %
QBIEY100%
-2.98%
BNT - QBIEY
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.47%
SMPNY - QBIEY
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.72%
TKOMY - QBIEY
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.37%
STC - QBIEY
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
DGICB - QBIEY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More