It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BNT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQBIEY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BNT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QBIEY’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
BNT (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -0.80% price change this week, while QBIEY (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +4.51% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.89%.
BNT is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.
Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
BNT | QBIEY | BNT / QBIEY | |
Capitalization | 5.01B | 15.8B | 32% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 40.872 | 30.907 | 132% |
P/E Ratio | 3.91 | 20.12 | 19% |
Revenue | 6.94B | 13.4B | 52% |
Total Cash | N/A | 833M | - |
Total Debt | 2.91B | 3.05B | 95% |
QBIEY | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 27 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 34 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BNT | QBIEY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago63% | 3 days ago62% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago72% | 3 days ago64% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago71% | 3 days ago70% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago75% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago61% | 3 days ago75% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago56% | 3 days ago74% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago66% | 3 days ago76% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago69% | 18 days ago61% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago63% | 3 days ago65% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago47% | 3 days ago70% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
BIS | 17.68 | 1.46 | +9.00% |
ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotech | |||
DOG | 26.27 | 0.19 | +0.73% |
ProShares Short Dow30 | |||
GABF | 48.44 | 0.04 | +0.08% |
Gabelli Financial Services Opp ETF | |||
IBDP | 25.15 | N/A | N/A |
iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Corp ETF | |||
JSMD | 76.80 | -1.51 | -1.93% |
Janus Henderson Small/Md Cp Gr Alpha ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BNT has been loosely correlated with CB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BNT jumps, then CB could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that QBIEY and BNT have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QBIEY and BNT's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QBIEY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
QBIEY | 100% | +0.26% | ||
BNT - QBIEY | 33% Poorly correlated | -1.59% | ||
SMPNY - QBIEY | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.55% | ||
MURGY - QBIEY | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.20% | ||
TKOMY - QBIEY | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.61% | ||
SPNT - QBIEY | 23% Poorly correlated | +2.18% | ||
More |