It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BNT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQBIEY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BNT’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QBIEY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
BNT (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -3.47% price change this week, while QBIEY (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -0.30% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.95%.
BNT is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.
Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
BNT | QBIEY | BNT / QBIEY | |
Capitalization | 5.01B | 15.8B | 32% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 14.120 | 28.654 | 49% |
P/E Ratio | 3.91 | 20.12 | 19% |
Revenue | 6.94B | 13.4B | 52% |
Total Cash | N/A | 833M | - |
Total Debt | 2.91B | 3.05B | 95% |
QBIEY | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 7 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 31 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 8 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BNT | QBIEY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago53% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago62% | 1 day ago87% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago54% | 1 day ago58% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago56% | 1 day ago51% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago60% | 1 day ago58% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago57% | 1 day ago51% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago67% | 11 days ago74% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago69% | 23 days ago59% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago73% | 1 day ago69% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago51% | 1 day ago46% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
TUSI | 25.34 | 0.03 | +0.12% |
Touchstone Ultra Short Income ETF | |||
SDY | 136.48 | -0.48 | -0.35% |
SPDR® S&P Dividend ETF | |||
PICK | 38.16 | -0.22 | -0.57% |
iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF | |||
OCTP | 28.33 | -0.30 | -1.04% |
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - Oct | |||
GAMR | 88.19 | -1.36 | -1.52% |
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BNT has been loosely correlated with RGA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BNT jumps, then RGA could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BNT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BNT | 100% | -2.39% | ||
RGA - BNT | 63% Loosely correlated | -7.86% | ||
MKL - BNT | 59% Loosely correlated | -3.82% | ||
L - BNT | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.28% | ||
CINF - BNT | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.89% | ||
KMPR - BNT | 52% Loosely correlated | -2.48% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that QBIEY and BNT have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QBIEY and BNT's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QBIEY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
QBIEY | 100% | -1.27% | ||
BNT - QBIEY | 33% Poorly correlated | -2.39% | ||
SMPNY - QBIEY | 25% Poorly correlated | +2.06% | ||
MURGY - QBIEY | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.23% | ||
TKOMY - QBIEY | 24% Poorly correlated | +1.56% | ||
SPNT - QBIEY | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |