Advertisement
BNT vs ROOT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNT is a Buy and ROOT is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BNT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileROOT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- BNT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- ROOT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BNT’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ROOT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BNT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- ROOT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
BNT (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -1.11% price change this week, while ROOT (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -8.31% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.21%.
Reported Earning Dates
BNT is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.
ROOT is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.65% weekly)Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
| BNT | ROOT | BNT / ROOT | |
| Capitalization | 5.01B | 892M | 561% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.557 | 89.764 | 3% |
| P/E Ratio | 3.91 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 6.94B | 455M | 1,525% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 846M | - |
| Total Debt | 2.91B | 291M | 999% |
| BNT | ROOT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 1 day ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 66% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 7 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 87% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EMNT | 98.59 | 0.01 | +0.01% |
| PIMCO Enhanced Short Mtrty Actv ESG ETF | |||
| FLRT | 47.30 | -0.03 | -0.06% |
| Pacer Pacific Asset Fltng Rt Hi Inc ETF | |||
| DRUP | 58.89 | -0.04 | -0.07% |
| GraniteShares Nasdaq Sel Disruptors ETF | |||
| KOMP | 51.24 | -0.05 | -0.10% |
| SPDR® S&P Kensho New Economies Comps ETF | |||
| EVNT | 11.19 | -0.01 | -0.13% |
| AltShares Event-Driven ETF | |||
BNT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BNT has been loosely correlated with RGA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BNT jumps, then RGA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BNT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BNT | 100% | -0.84% | ||
| RGA - BNT | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| L - BNT | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.55% | ||
| MKL - BNT | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.03% | ||
| CINF - BNT | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| KMPR - BNT | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.53% | ||
More | ||||
ROOT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ROOT has been loosely correlated with LMND. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ROOT jumps, then LMND could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ROOT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROOT | 100% | +0.89% | ||
| LMND - ROOT | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.49% | ||
| BNT - ROOT | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.84% | ||
| KMPR - ROOT | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.53% | ||
| UFCS - ROOT | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.07% | ||
| RGA - ROOT | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.70% | ||
More | ||||