BNT
Price
$66.16
Change
+$0.30 (+0.46%)
Updated
Aug 29, 01:37 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
18.68B
69 days until earnings call
ROOT
Price
$91.26
Change
+$1.00 (+1.11%)
Updated
Aug 29, 04:17 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.39B
68 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BNT vs ROOT

Header iconBNT vs ROOT Comparison
Open Charts BNT vs ROOTBanner chart's image
Brookfield Wealth Solutions
Price$66.16
Change+$0.30 (+0.46%)
Volume$141
Capitalization18.68B
Root
Price$91.26
Change+$1.00 (+1.11%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.39B
BNT vs ROOT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BNT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ROOT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNT vs. ROOT commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNT is a StrongBuy and ROOT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (BNT: $65.86 vs. ROOT: $90.26)
Brand notoriety: BNT and ROOT are both not notable
BNT represents the Multi-Line Insurance, while ROOT is part of the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNT: 45% vs. ROOT: 73%
Market capitalization -- BNT: $18.68B vs. ROOT: $1.39B
BNT [@Multi-Line Insurance] is valued at $18.68B. ROOT’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $1.39B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $144.32B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $32.44B. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileROOT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BNT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ROOT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BNT is a better buy in the long-term than ROOT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ROOT’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BNT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ROOT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ROOT is a better buy in the short-term than BNT.

Price Growth

BNT (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а +2.71% price change this week, while ROOT (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +2.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was +0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.55%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

BNT is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

ROOT is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Multi-Line Insurance (+0.22% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

@Property/Casualty Insurance (-0.01% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BNT($18.7B) has a higher market cap than ROOT($1.39B). ROOT has higher P/E ratio than BNT: ROOT (17.56) vs BNT (10.71). ROOT YTD gains are higher at: 24.342 vs. BNT (15.046). BNT has more cash in the bank: 30.8B vs. ROOT (964M). ROOT has less debt than BNT: ROOT (200M) vs BNT (4.71B). BNT has higher revenues than ROOT: BNT (14.2B) vs ROOT (1.37B).
BNTROOTBNT / ROOT
Capitalization18.7B1.39B1,341%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD15.04624.34262%
P/E Ratio10.7117.5661%
Revenue14.2B1.37B1,040%
Total Cash30.8B964M3,195%
Total Debt4.71B200M2,356%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNTROOT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BNT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ROOT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BBGSX17.250.17
+1.00%
Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Growth
JNRRX57.41N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources R
IYBFX25.23N/A
N/A
Macquarie Balanced Fund Class R
SIMYX13.15N/A
N/A
SEI Tax-Managed Intl Mgd Vol Y (SIMT)
KVALX13.11N/A
N/A
Kennedy Capital Small Cap Value Instl

BNT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BNT has been loosely correlated with L. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BNT jumps, then L could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNT
1D Price
Change %
BNT100%
+0.58%
L - BNT
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
MKL - BNT
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
AEG - BNT
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
CINF - BNT
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.40%
KMPR - BNT
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
More

ROOT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ROOT has been loosely correlated with LMND. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ROOT jumps, then LMND could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ROOT
1D Price
Change %
ROOT100%
+1.48%
LMND - ROOT
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.13%
HIPO - ROOT
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.95%
BNT - ROOT
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.58%
MKL - ROOT
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.17%
HGTY - ROOT
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.90%
More