BNT
Price
$57.03
Change
-$0.04 (-0.07%)
Updated
May 23, 04:55 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.01B
76 days until earnings call
TKOMF
Price
$40.99
Change
-$1.09 (-2.59%)
Updated
May 21 closing price
Capitalization
45.95B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BNT vs TKOMF

Header iconBNT vs TKOMF Comparison
Open Charts BNT vs TKOMFBanner chart's image
Brookfield Wealth Solutions
Price$57.03
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
Volume$100
Capitalization5.01B
Tokio Marine Holdings
Price$40.99
Change-$1.09 (-2.59%)
Volume$2.42K
Capitalization45.95B
BNT vs TKOMF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BNT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNT vs. TKOMF commentary
May 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNT is a Hold and TKOMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 24, 2025
Stock price -- (BNT: $57.07 vs. TKOMF: $40.99)
Brand notoriety: BNT and TKOMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNT: 97% vs. TKOMF: 2%
Market capitalization -- BNT: $5.01B vs. TKOMF: $45.95B
BNT [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $5.01B. TKOMF’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $45.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $121.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $14.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTKOMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BNT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TKOMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TKOMF is a better buy in the long-term than BNT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BNT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

BNT (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -4.16% price change this week, while TKOMF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +0.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -1.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

BNT is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (-1.32% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TKOMF($46B) has a higher market cap than BNT($5.01B). TKOMF has higher P/E ratio than BNT: TKOMF (16.72) vs BNT (3.91). TKOMF YTD gains are higher at: 6.940 vs. BNT (-0.460). BNT has less debt than TKOMF: BNT (2.91B) vs TKOMF (223B). TKOMF has higher revenues than BNT: TKOMF (6.44T) vs BNT (6.94B).
BNTTKOMFBNT / TKOMF
Capitalization5.01B46B11%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.4606.940-7%
P/E Ratio3.9116.7223%
Revenue6.94B6.44T0%
Total CashN/A872B-
Total Debt2.91B223B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TKOMF: Fundamental Ratings
TKOMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
38
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
11
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
78
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BNT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CWI31.68N/A
N/A
SPDR® MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF
GRX9.52N/A
N/A
Gabelli Healthcare & Wellness Trust (The)
CVLC72.26N/A
N/A
Calvert US Large-Cp Cor Rspnb ETF
ICOP27.49-0.05
-0.18%
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF
FDWM22.74-0.38
-1.62%
Fidelity Women's Leadership ETF

BNT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BNT has been loosely correlated with RGA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BNT jumps, then RGA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNT
1D Price
Change %
BNT100%
N/A
RGA - BNT
61%
Loosely correlated
N/A
L - BNT
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.16%
MKL - BNT
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
CINF - BNT
55%
Loosely correlated
N/A
KMPR - BNT
54%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

TKOMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TKOMF has been loosely correlated with MSADF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TKOMF jumps, then MSADF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TKOMF
1D Price
Change %
TKOMF100%
N/A
MSADF - TKOMF
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TKOMY - TKOMF
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
MSADY - TKOMF
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
RGA - TKOMF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BNT - TKOMF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More