BNT
Price
$65.43
Change
+$0.56 (+0.86%)
Updated
Aug 26, 04:57 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
18.51B
72 days until earnings call
TKOMF
Price
$47.26
Change
+$3.81 (+8.77%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
84.79B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BNT vs TKOMF

Header iconBNT vs TKOMF Comparison
Open Charts BNT vs TKOMFBanner chart's image
Brookfield Wealth Solutions
Price$65.43
Change+$0.56 (+0.86%)
Volume$100
Capitalization18.51B
Tokio Marine Holdings
Price$47.26
Change+$3.81 (+8.77%)
Volume$50.26K
Capitalization84.79B
BNT vs TKOMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BNT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TKOMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNT vs. TKOMF commentary
Aug 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNT is a StrongBuy and TKOMF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 26, 2025
Stock price -- (BNT: $64.87 vs. TKOMF: $47.26)
Brand notoriety: BNT and TKOMF are both not notable
BNT represents the Multi-Line Insurance, while TKOMF is part of the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNT: 78% vs. TKOMF: 1184%
Market capitalization -- BNT: $18.51B vs. TKOMF: $84.79B
BNT [@Multi-Line Insurance] is valued at $18.51B. TKOMF’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $84.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $143.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $33.45B. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTKOMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BNT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TKOMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TKOMF is a better buy in the long-term than BNT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TKOMF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BNT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TKOMF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TKOMF is a better buy in the short-term than BNT.

Price Growth

BNT (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а -0.51% price change this week, while TKOMF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +7.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was +0.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.46%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +1.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.29%.

Reported Earning Dates

BNT is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Multi-Line Insurance (+0.09% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+1.40% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TKOMF($84.8B) has a higher market cap than BNT($18.5B). TKOMF has higher P/E ratio than BNT: TKOMF (12.87) vs BNT (10.55). TKOMF YTD gains are higher at: 23.298 vs. BNT (13.316). TKOMF has more cash in the bank: 1.06T vs. BNT (30.8B). BNT has less debt than TKOMF: BNT (4.71B) vs TKOMF (228B). TKOMF has higher revenues than BNT: TKOMF (7.75T) vs BNT (14.2B).
BNTTKOMFBNT / TKOMF
Capitalization18.5B84.8B22%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD13.31623.29857%
P/E Ratio10.5512.8782%
Revenue14.2B7.75T0%
Total Cash30.8B1.06T3%
Total Debt4.71B228B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TKOMF: Fundamental Ratings
TKOMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
31
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNTTKOMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
69%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BNT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TKOMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TRNR4.020.18
+4.69%
Interactive Strength Inc
LU3.110.04
+1.30%
Lufax Holding Ltd
CHRW126.411.23
+0.98%
C.H. Robinson Worldwide
HBNB2.240.01
+0.27%
Hotel101 Global Holdings Corp.
VTGN3.03-0.14
-4.42%
VistaGen Therapeutics

BNT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BNT has been loosely correlated with L. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BNT jumps, then L could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNT
1D Price
Change %
BNT100%
-1.47%
L - BNT
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.67%
MKL - BNT
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
AEG - BNT
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.38%
CINF - BNT
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.34%
KMPR - BNT
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.31%
More

TKOMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TKOMF has been loosely correlated with MSADF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TKOMF jumps, then MSADF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TKOMF
1D Price
Change %
TKOMF100%
N/A
MSADF - TKOMF
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.08%
TKOMY - TKOMF
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.37%
MSADY - TKOMF
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.38%
BNT - TKOMF
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.47%
ACIC - TKOMF
7%
Poorly correlated
-3.40%
More