Advertisement
BNY vs UBS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNY is a Hold and UBS is a Hold.
| BNY | UBS | BNY / UBS | |
| Capitalization | 110B | 168B | 65% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 40.673 | 20.935 | 194% |
| P/E Ratio | 18.98 | 18.56 | 102% |
| Revenue | 21.1B | 50.9B | 41% |
| Total Cash | 6.39B | 210B | 3% |
| Total Debt | 35.6B | 351B | 10% |
BNY | UBS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 91 | 89 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | 67 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 4 | 8 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 6 | 5 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 31 | 59 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
UBS's Valuation (67) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BNY (92) in the null industry. This means that UBS’s stock grew similarly to BNY’s over the last 12 months.
BNY's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as UBS (8) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BNY’s stock grew similarly to UBS’s over the last 12 months.
UBS's SMR Rating (5) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BNY (6) in the null industry. This means that UBS’s stock grew similarly to BNY’s over the last 12 months.
BNY's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as UBS (40) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BNY’s stock grew similarly to UBS’s over the last 12 months.
BNY's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the null industry is in the same range as UBS (59) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BNY’s stock grew similarly to UBS’s over the last 12 months.
| BNY | UBS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 10 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 47% | 3 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 48% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 58% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BNY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while UBS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- BNY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- UBS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BNY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UBS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BNY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- UBS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
BNY (@Major Banks) experienced а -1.32% price change this week, while UBS (@Major Banks) price change was -1.44% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -0.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +35.41%.
Reported Earning Dates
BNY is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2026.
UBS is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Major Banks (-0.86% weekly)Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.
Advertisement
BNY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BNY and BCS have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BNY and BCS's prices will move in lockstep.
UBS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UBS has been closely correlated with BCS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UBS jumps, then BCS could also see price increases.