BNY
Price
$147.28
Change
+$0.84 (+0.57%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
101.1B
22 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SAN
Price
$13.60
Change
-$0.11 (-0.80%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
196.22B
29 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BNY vs SAN

BNY vs SAN Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNY vs. SAN commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNY is a Hold and SAN is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 24, 2026
Stock price -- (BNY: $146.44 vs. SAN: $13.71)
Brand notoriety: BNY and SAN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNY: 90% vs. SAN: 73%
Market capitalization -- BNY: $100.51B vs. SAN: $197.49B
BNY [@Major Banks] is valued at $100.51B. SAN’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $197.49B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $888.2B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $205.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSAN’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BNY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SAN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BNY and SAN are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BNY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SAN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SAN is a better buy in the short-term than BNY.

Price Growth

BNY (@Major Banks) experienced а +2.76% price change this week, while SAN (@Major Banks) price change was +4.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +0.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

BNY is expected to report earnings on Jul 15, 2026.

SAN is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+0.90% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SAN($196B) has a higher market cap than BNY($101B). BNY has higher P/E ratio than SAN: BNY (18.17) vs SAN (13.52). BNY YTD gains are higher at: 26.144 vs. SAN (18.311). BNY has less debt than SAN: BNY (33.8B) vs SAN (329B). SAN has higher revenues than BNY: SAN (60.5B) vs BNY (20.4B).
BNYSANBNY / SAN
Capitalization101B196B52%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD26.14418.311143%
P/E Ratio18.1713.52134%
Revenue20.4B60.5B34%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt33.8B329B10%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BNY vs SAN: Fundamental Ratings
BNY
SAN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8926
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
86
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4240
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4717
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SAN's Valuation (75) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BNY (88) in the null industry. This means that SAN’s stock grew similarly to BNY’s over the last 12 months.

SAN's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BNY (8) in the null industry. This means that SAN’s stock grew similarly to BNY’s over the last 12 months.

SAN's SMR Rating (4) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BNY (9) in the null industry. This means that SAN’s stock grew similarly to BNY’s over the last 12 months.

SAN's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BNY (42) in the null industry. This means that SAN’s stock grew similarly to BNY’s over the last 12 months.

SAN's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BNY (47) in the null industry. This means that SAN’s stock grew similarly to BNY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNYSAN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
50%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BNY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SAN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NVS148.931.85
+1.26%
Novartis AG
GLP43.090.51
+1.20%
Global Partners LP
NTIP1.480.01
+0.68%
Network-1 Technologies
LWAC10.21N/A
N/A
LightWave Acquisition Corp
QMMM119.40N/A
N/A
QMMM Holdings Ltd

BNY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BNY and BCS have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BNY and BCS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNY
1D Price
Change %
BNY100%
+1.96%
BCS - BNY
18%
Poorly correlated
+3.72%
SAN - BNY
15%
Poorly correlated
+1.56%
BBVA - BNY
14%
Poorly correlated
+1.51%
UBS - BNY
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.67%
ING - BNY
14%
Poorly correlated
+2.68%
More

SAN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAN has been closely correlated with BBVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SAN jumps, then BBVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAN
1D Price
Change %
SAN100%
+1.56%
BBVA - SAN
77%
Closely correlated
+1.51%
ING - SAN
74%
Closely correlated
+2.68%
BCS - SAN
72%
Closely correlated
+3.72%
HSBC - SAN
71%
Closely correlated
+1.62%
UBS - SAN
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
More