Advertisement
BOH vs HBANP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BOH is a StrongBuy and HBANP is a Buy.
| BOH | HBANP | BOH / HBANP | |
| Capitalization | 2.95B | N/A | - |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.438 | 0.365 | 2,589% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.87 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 756M | 9.68B | 8% |
| Total Cash | 272M | 2.1B | 13% |
| Total Debt | 602M | 21.8B | 3% |
BOH | HBANP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 83 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 47 Fair valued | 9 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 92 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 15 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 69 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HBANP's Valuation (9) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BOH (47). This means that HBANP’s stock grew somewhat faster than BOH’s over the last 12 months.
BOH's Profit vs Risk Rating (92) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HBANP (100). This means that BOH’s stock grew similarly to HBANP’s over the last 12 months.
BOH's SMR Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for HBANP (100). This means that BOH’s stock grew significantly faster than HBANP’s over the last 12 months.
HBANP's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BOH (52). This means that HBANP’s stock grew similarly to BOH’s over the last 12 months.
BOH's P/E Growth Rating (69) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HBANP (100). This means that BOH’s stock grew similarly to HBANP’s over the last 12 months.
| BOH | HBANP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 35% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 43% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 33% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 39% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 36% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 30% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 58% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 68% | 7 days ago 50% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 28% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 31% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BOH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while HBANP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BOH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- HBANP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BOH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HBANP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BOH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- HBANP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BOH (@Regional Banks) experienced а -4.18% price change this week, while HBANP (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.03% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.69%.
Reported Earning Dates
BOH is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (-1.36% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CCSO | 25.20 | 0.15 | +0.59% |
| Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF (CCSO) | |||
| EXG | 9.66 | 0.04 | +0.42% |
| Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Diversified Equity Income Fund | |||
| KNRG | 25.54 | 0.03 | +0.12% |
| Simplify Kayne Anderson Energy And Infrastructure Credit ETF | |||
| DEFI | 72.77 | N/A | N/A |
| Hashdex Commodities Trust | |||
| CALI | 50.08 | -0.02 | -0.03% |
| iShares Short-Term California Muni Active ETF (CALI) | |||
BOH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BOH has been closely correlated with FULT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BOH jumps, then FULT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BOH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOH | 100% | -2.44% | ||
| FULT - BOH | 84% Closely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| FHB - BOH | 84% Closely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| UBSI - BOH | 83% Closely correlated | -0.74% | ||
| ONB - BOH | 81% Closely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| TRMK - BOH | 80% Closely correlated | -0.58% | ||
More | ||||
HBANP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBANP has been loosely correlated with HNVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HBANP jumps, then HNVR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HBANP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HBANP | 100% | -0.66% | ||
| HNVR - HBANP | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| HBANM - HBANP | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.74% | ||
| ECBK - HBANP | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.96% | ||
| HAPN - HBANP | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.12% | ||
| BOH - HBANP | 34% Loosely correlated | -2.44% | ||
More | ||||