Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BOPCX vs FWMMX
BOPCX vs FWMMX Comparison
Open Charts BOPCX vs FWMMX
BOPCX vs FWMMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. BOPCX (351M). FWMMX pays higher dividends than BOPCX: FWMMX (1.37) vs BOPCX (0.00). BOPCX was incepted earlier than FWMMX: BOPCX (23 years) vs FWMMX (6 years). BOPCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). BOPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.82 vs. FWMMX (29.00). FWMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than BOPCX: FWMMX (250) vs BOPCX (1000). FWMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.27 vs. BOPCX (-14.08). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 29.71 vs. BOPCX (-50.96).
| BOPCX | FWMMX | BOPCX / FWMMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.35 | 531% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.35 | 531% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.010 | 6.039 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 351M | 218B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.37 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.08 | 11.27 | -125% |
| Returns for 3 years | -33.45 | 31.30 | -107% |
| Returns for 5 years | -50.96 | 29.71 | -172% |
| Returns for 10 years | -29.66 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement