BOTZ
Price
$36.58
Change
-$0.06 (-0.16%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Net Assets
3.42B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SMH
Price
$618.92
Change
-$3.13 (-0.50%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Net Assets
73.41B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BOTZ vs SMH

BOTZ vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF (BOTZ) vs. VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH)

Key Takeaways

  • BOTZ offers thematic exposure to robotics and AI across 62 holdings in multiple sectors like industrials (45%) and technology (35%), providing broader diversification compared to SMH's concentrated 26 semiconductor-focused holdings.
  • SMH delivers pure-play semiconductor sector exposure (100% information technology), tracking leaders in chip design and manufacturing with top holdings comprising over 70% of assets.
  • Expense ratios differ notably: BOTZ at 0.68% versus SMH's lower 0.35%, impacting long-term cost efficiency for investors.
  • Both ETFs exhibit high volatility tied to tech innovation cycles, but SMH shows stronger relative positioning in recent market cycles driven by AI infrastructure demand.
  • BOTZ emphasizes global companies in automation and autonomous systems, while SMH prioritizes U.S.-listed firms enabling semiconductor production.
  • Liquidity is robust for both, with SMH benefiting from significantly larger assets under management (AUM, assets under management).

Introduction

In the rapidly evolving landscape of artificial intelligence (AI) and automation, investors seek targeted exposure through thematic exchange-traded funds (ETFs). The BOTZ and SMH ETFs represent complementary yet distinct strategies within this domain. BOTZ provides diversified access to robotics and AI applications across industries, while SMH focuses on the semiconductor backbone powering these technologies. Comparing them highlights trade-offs in diversification, sector purity, costs, and sensitivity to AI hardware demand. As capital flows into tech amid ongoing innovation cycles, understanding their structural differences aids portfolio positioning for sector exposure versus thematic breadth.

Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF (BOTZ) Overview

The Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF (BOTZ) is a passively managed thematic ETF that seeks to track the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Launched in September 2016 by Global X (Mirae Asset Global Investments), it invests at least 80% of its assets in companies benefiting from robotics and AI adoption, including industrial automation, non-industrial robots, and autonomous vehicles.

Key structural features include approximately 62 holdings, with top 10 accounting for about 58%: Keyence Corp (9.4%), ABB Ltd (8.8%), Fanuc Corp (8.5%), NVDA (8.4%), and Intuitive Surgical Inc (5.9%). Sector allocations (as of April 2026) emphasize industrials (44.8%), information technology (34.5%), and health care (9.6%). The expense ratio is 0.68%, with semi-annual distributions. Non-diversified by design, it offers global exposure across developed markets, rebalanced periodically by the index provider to reflect thematic relevance.

VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) Overview

The VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) is a passively managed sector ETF tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Issued by VanEck since December 2011, it invests at least 80% of assets in U.S.-exchange-listed companies involved in semiconductor production and equipment, including depositary receipts.

With 26 holdings, it is highly concentrated: top 10 represent over 71%, led by NVDA (17%), Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSM, 10.5%), Broadcom Inc (AVGO, 8%), INTC (7%), and AMD (6.2%). Sector allocation is 100% information technology. The expense ratio stands at 0.35%, with quarterly distributions. The market-cap-weighted index selects the top 25 by liquidity and size, applying caps for diversification, and rebalances quarterly.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The semiconductor and robotics/AI sectors operate amid robust macro tailwinds, with global chip sales projected to reach $975 billion in 2026, driven by AI infrastructure buildout and data center expansion. Catalysts include surging demand for advanced chips in generative AI, edge computing, and automation, alongside policy support like the CHIPS Act for U.S. manufacturing reshoring. Capital flows favor semiconductors as the "industry of industries," enabling robotics advancements.

Risks encompass supply chain vulnerabilities, U.S.-China trade tensions, and potential AI investment slowdowns. Robotics benefits from labor shortages, aging demographics, and humanoid robot development, with market growth from $108 billion to $416 billion by 2035. Both themes face cyclical pressures from interest rate shifts and geopolitical developments, yet structural demand from AI adoption persists.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, SMH has demonstrated superior relative positioning, benefiting from semiconductor leaders' earnings momentum in AI hardware. Over multi-year periods, SMH's annualized returns have outpaced BOTZ, reflecting concentrated exposure to high-growth chipmakers amid sector rotation toward infrastructure enablers. BOTZ, with broader diversification, exhibits lower volatility but trails in up-cycles driven by NVDA and peers.

Volatility profiles align with tech beta above 1.5 versus the S&P 500, amplified for SMH by top-heavy structure. Performance dynamics tie to AI compute demand, commodity trends in rare earths, and interest rate expectations favoring growth sectors. BOTZ gains from automation tailwinds, while SMH leverages chip supply constraints and geopolitical pushes for domestic production.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across asset classes like thematic ETFs.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors SMH with moderate probability due to its cost efficiency (0.35% expense ratio), structural alignment with surging semiconductor momentum, and consistent trend strength in AI infrastructure cycles. While BOTZ offers superior diversification, SMH's concentrated exposure to sector leaders enhances return potential amid observable capital flows, tempered by higher single-stock risk.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
BOTZ vs. SMH commentary
Jun 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BOTZ is a Hold and SMH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 73.4B vs. BOTZ (3.42B). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than BOTZ: SMH (71.860) vs BOTZ (0.966). BOTZ was incepted earlier than SMH: BOTZ (10 years) vs SMH (15 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than BOTZ (0.68). BOTZ (12.11) and SMH (12.00) have matching turnover.
BOTZSMHBOTZ / SMH
Gain YTD0.96671.8601%
Net Assets3.42B73.4B5%
Total Expense Ratio0.680.35194%
Turnover12.1112.00101%
Yield0.590.18320%
Fund Existence10 years15 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BOTZSMH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BOTZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SMH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CPAG102.870.56
+0.55%
F/m Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
DIHP33.56-0.01
-0.04%
Dimensional International High Pbly ETF
PIPE29.67-0.32
-1.06%
Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
DJP43.16-0.91
-2.06%
iPath® Bloomberg Cmdty TR ETN
DGP128.29-9.25
-6.73%
DB Gold Double Long ETN

BOTZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BOTZ has been loosely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BOTZ jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BOTZ
1D Price
Change %
BOTZ100%
-0.16%
NVDA - BOTZ
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.52%
SERV - BOTZ
58%
Loosely correlated
-4.21%
WRD - BOTZ
57%
Loosely correlated
-2.61%
HSAI - BOTZ
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.73%
SOUN - BOTZ
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.55%
More

SMH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMH
1D Price
Change %
SMH100%
-0.50%
LRCX - SMH
86%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
KLAC - SMH
84%
Closely correlated
-1.64%
AMAT - SMH
83%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
TSM - SMH
81%
Closely correlated
+1.02%
ASML - SMH
80%
Closely correlated
-0.88%
More