BPYPM
Price
$16.05
Change
+$0.12 (+0.75%)
Updated
Sep 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
CG
Price
$64.14
Change
+$0.39 (+0.61%)
Updated
Sep 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
23.06B
64 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BPYPM vs CG

Header iconBPYPM vs CG Comparison
Open Charts BPYPM vs CGBanner chart's image
Brookfield Property Partners
Price$16.05
Change+$0.12 (+0.75%)
Volume$2.8K
CapitalizationN/A
Carlyle Group (The)
Price$64.14
Change+$0.39 (+0.61%)
Volume$68.75K
Capitalization23.06B
BPYPM vs CG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BPYPM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPYPM vs. CG commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPYPM is a StrongBuy and CG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (BPYPM: $15.93 vs. CG: $63.75)
Brand notoriety: BPYPM and CG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPYPM: 123% vs. CG: 120%
Market capitalization -- BPYPM: $0 vs. CG: $23.06B
BPYPM [@Investment Managers] is valued at $0. CG’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $23.06B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPYPM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BPYPM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CG is a better buy in the long-term than BPYPM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPYPM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BPYPM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BPYPM is a better buy in the short-term than CG.

Price Growth

BPYPM (@Investment Managers) experienced а +3.99% price change this week, while CG (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

CG is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.13% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CG YTD gains are higher at: 28.769 vs. BPYPM (11.557).
BPYPMCGBPYPM / CG
CapitalizationN/A23.1B-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD11.55728.76940%
P/E RatioN/A18.64-
RevenueN/A3.71B-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A10.5B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CG: Fundamental Ratings
CG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
34
SMR RATING
1..100
30
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPYPMCG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BPYPM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PFFL8.980.14
+1.53%
ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Lvrgd Pref Stk ETN
MIY11.350.15
+1.34%
Blackrock Muniyield Michigan Quality Fund
IBGB24.920.33
+1.33%
iShares iBonds Dec 2045 Term Trsy ETF
FXR79.630.39
+0.49%
First Trust Indtls/PrdcrDurbAlphaDEX®ETF
FIBR88.92N/A
N/A
iShares U.S. Fixed Inc Bal Rsk Sysmc ETF

BPYPM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BPYPM has been loosely correlated with TROW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BPYPM jumps, then TROW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPYPM
1D Price
Change %
BPYPM100%
+1.93%
TROW - BPYPM
35%
Loosely correlated
-3.01%
PNNT - BPYPM
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
GSBD - BPYPM
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.44%
BEN - BPYPM
31%
Poorly correlated
-2.99%
CG - BPYPM
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.82%
More