Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BQLCX vs FWMMX
BQLCX vs FWMMX Comparison
Open Charts BQLCX vs FWMMX
BQLCX vs FWMMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. BQLCX (440M). FWMMX pays higher dividends than BQLCX: FWMMX (1.41) vs BQLCX (0.97). BQLCX was incepted earlier than FWMMX: BQLCX (16 years) vs FWMMX (6 years). BQLCX (0.67) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). BQLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FWMMX (29.00). FWMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than BQLCX: FWMMX (250) vs BQLCX (100000). FWMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.72 vs. BQLCX (-0.11). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.58 vs. BQLCX (2.68).
| BQLCX | FWMMX | BQLCX / FWMMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.35 | 191% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.35 | 191% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.168 | 3.822 | 31% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 440M | 219B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 1.41 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.11 | 5.72 | -2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.08 | 29.02 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.68 | 30.58 | 9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.61 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement