Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BQLCX vs FWMMX
BQLCX vs FWMMX Comparison
Open Charts BQLCX vs FWMMX
BQLCX vs FWMMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. BQLCX (428M). FWMMX pays higher dividends than BQLCX: FWMMX (1.37) vs BQLCX (0.85). BQLCX was incepted earlier than FWMMX: BQLCX (16 years) vs FWMMX (6 years). BQLCX (0.66) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). BQLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FWMMX (29.00). FWMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than BQLCX: FWMMX (250) vs BQLCX (100000). FWMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.50 vs. BQLCX (0.49). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 32.69 vs. BQLCX (3.73).
| BQLCX | FWMMX | BQLCX / FWMMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.35 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.35 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.693 | 2.046 | -83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 428M | 218B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 1.37 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.49 | 8.50 | 6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.06 | 24.36 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.73 | 32.69 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.98 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement