Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BQLCX vs FWWMX
BQLCX vs FWWMX Comparison
Open Charts BQLCX vs FWWMX
BQLCX vs FWWMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BQLCX vs. FWWMX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BQLCX is a Buy and FWWMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. BQLCX (454M). FWWMX pays higher dividends than BQLCX: FWWMX (1.41) vs BQLCX (0.87). BQLCX was incepted earlier than FWWMX: BQLCX (16 years) vs FWWMX (6 years). BQLCX (0.67) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). BQLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FWWMX (32.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than BQLCX: FWWMX (250) vs BQLCX (100000). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.09 vs. BQLCX (1.50). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.17 vs. BQLCX (6.18).
| BQLCX | FWWMX | BQLCX / FWWMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.31 | 216% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.31 | 216% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.907 | 4.506 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 454M | 218B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.87 | 1.41 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.50 | 2.09 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.34 | 30.23 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.18 | 30.17 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.03 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement