Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BQLCX vs FWWMX
BQLCX vs FWWMX Comparison
Open Charts BQLCX vs FWWMX
BQLCX vs FWWMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. BQLCX (428M). FWWMX pays higher dividends than BQLCX: FWWMX (1.40) vs BQLCX (0.85). BQLCX was incepted earlier than FWWMX: BQLCX (16 years) vs FWWMX (6 years). BQLCX (0.66) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). BQLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FWWMX (29.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than BQLCX: FWWMX (250) vs BQLCX (100000). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.56 vs. BQLCX (0.49). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 32.95 vs. BQLCX (3.73).
| BQLCX | FWWMX | BQLCX / FWWMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.31 | 213% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.31 | 213% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.693 | 2.079 | -81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 428M | 218B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 1.40 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.49 | 8.56 | 6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.06 | 24.40 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.73 | 32.95 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.98 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement