Advertisement
BRSL vs LVS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRSL is a Hold and LVS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BRSL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLVS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BRSL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- LVS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BRSL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LVS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BRSL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- LVS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
BRSL (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а +3.78% price change this week, while LVS (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was +1.53% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.58%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was -2.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.17%.
Reported Earning Dates
BRSL is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
LVS is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Casinos/Gaming (-0.96% weekly)Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.
@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (-2.04% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.
| BRSL | LVS | BRSL / LVS | |
| Capitalization | 2.07B | 31.1B | 7% |
| EBITDA | 1.03B | 4.79B | 22% |
| Gain YTD | -24.417 | -27.009 | 90% |
| P/E Ratio | 36.44 | 17.64 | 207% |
| Revenue | 2.52B | 13.7B | 18% |
| Total Cash | 1.25B | 3.33B | 38% |
| Total Debt | 4.08B | 15.7B | 26% |
BRSL | LVS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 4 Undervalued | 57 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 64 | 13 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 71 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 75 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BRSL's Valuation (4) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LVS (57). This means that BRSL’s stock grew somewhat faster than LVS’s over the last 12 months.
BRSL's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as LVS (100). This means that BRSL’s stock grew similarly to LVS’s over the last 12 months.
LVS's SMR Rating (13) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BRSL (64). This means that LVS’s stock grew somewhat faster than BRSL’s over the last 12 months.
LVS's Price Growth Rating (63) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as BRSL (71). This means that LVS’s stock grew similarly to BRSL’s over the last 12 months.
LVS's P/E Growth Rating (75) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as BRSL (98). This means that LVS’s stock grew similarly to BRSL’s over the last 12 months.
| BRSL | LVS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 65% | 5 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 55% | 5 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 48% | 5 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 63% | 5 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 73% | 5 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 61% | 5 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 74% | 7 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 72% | 5 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 68% | 5 days ago 79% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| UBEW | 28.52 | 0.78 | +2.82% |
| Roundhill UBER WeeklyPay ETF | |||
| CGSM | 26.38 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
| Capital Group Short Dur Muncpl Inc ETF | |||
| SPBX | 29.17 | N/A | -0.01% |
| AllianzIM 6 Month Buffer10 Allocation ETF | |||
| SIO | 25.67 | -0.01 | -0.04% |
| Touchstone Strategic Income ETF | |||
| MSTQ | 38.58 | -0.70 | -1.78% |
| LHA Market State™ Tactical Q ETF | |||
BRSL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRSL has been loosely correlated with HGV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BRSL jumps, then HGV could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BRSL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRSL | 100% | +1.08% | ||
| HGV - BRSL | 39% Loosely correlated | +2.78% | ||
| VAC - BRSL | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| RRR - BRSL | 37% Loosely correlated | +2.20% | ||
| MGM - BRSL | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.88% | ||
| LVS - BRSL | 33% Loosely correlated | +1.60% | ||
More | ||||
LVS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LVS has been loosely correlated with MLCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LVS jumps, then MLCO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LVS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LVS | 100% | +1.60% | ||
| MLCO - LVS | 53% Loosely correlated | +2.86% | ||
| MGM - LVS | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.88% | ||
| BRSL - LVS | 40% Loosely correlated | +1.08% | ||
| INSE - LVS | 38% Loosely correlated | +1.68% | ||
| DKNG - LVS | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.47% | ||
More | ||||