Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BRUDX vs RMEBX
BRUDX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts BRUDX vs RMEBX
BRUDX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BRUDX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRUDX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. BRUDX (336M). BRUDX (1.03) and RMEBX (0.99) have matching dividends . BRUDX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: BRUDX (11 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than BRUDX (0.69). BRUDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than BRUDX: RMEBX (250) vs BRUDX (1000). BRUDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.63 vs. RMEBX (8.96). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.13 vs. BRUDX (22.48).
| BRUDX | RMEBX | BRUDX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.07 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.478 | 9.416 | 228% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 0.99 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.63 | 8.96 | 197% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.53 | 32.63 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.48 | 36.13 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.52 | 90.64 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers