Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BRUDX vs RMEBX
BRUDX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts BRUDX vs RMEBX
BRUDX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BRUDX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRUDX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. BRUDX (331M). BRUDX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: BRUDX (1.10) vs RMEBX (1.04). BRUDX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: BRUDX (11 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than BRUDX (0.69). BRUDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than BRUDX: RMEBX (250) vs BRUDX (1000). BRUDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.68 vs. RMEBX (9.98). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 32.93 vs. BRUDX (14.30).
| BRUDX | RMEBX | BRUDX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.07 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.708 | 5.801 | 236% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 331M | 115B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 1.04 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.68 | 9.98 | 147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.31 | 34.14 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.30 | 32.93 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.93 | 89.84 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement