Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BRUDX vs RMFEX
BRUDX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts BRUDX vs RMFEX
BRUDX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BRUDX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRUDX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. BRUDX (331M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than BRUDX: RMFEX (1.45) vs BRUDX (1.10). BRUDX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: BRUDX (11 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). BRUDX (0.69) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). BRUDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than BRUDX: RMFEX (250) vs BRUDX (1000). BRUDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.68 vs. RMFEX (10.46). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 35.97 vs. BRUDX (14.30).
| BRUDX | RMFEX | BRUDX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.62 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.62 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.708 | 5.987 | 229% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 331M | 115B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 1.45 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.68 | 10.46 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.31 | 35.96 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.30 | 35.97 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.93 | 99.50 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement