Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BRWCX vs RGEBX
BRWCX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts BRWCX vs RGEBX
BRWCX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BRWCX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRWCX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. BRWCX (673M). BRWCX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . BRWCX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: BRWCX (11 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). BRWCX (1.43) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.08). BRWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than BRWCX: RGEBX (250) vs BRWCX (1000). BRWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.56 vs. RGEBX (7.66). BRWCX return over 5 years is better than : 33.23 vs. RGEBX (12.07).
| BRWCX | RGEBX | BRWCX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.08 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.08 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.162 | 6.118 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 673M | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.56 | 7.66 | 190% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.51 | 42.13 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.23 | 12.07 | 275% |
| Returns for 10 years | 177.36 | 104.15 | 170% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement