Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BSICX vs PUBAX
BSICX vs PUBAX Comparison
Open Charts BSICX vs PUBAX
BSICX vs PUBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BSICX vs. PUBAX commentary
Aug 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSICX is a Hold and PUBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BSICX has more cash in the bank: 48.4B vs. PUBAX (2.2B). PUBAX pays higher dividends than BSICX: PUBAX (5.17) vs BSICX (3.76). BSICX was incepted earlier than PUBAX: BSICX (19 years) vs PUBAX (18 years). BSICX (1.71) is less costly to investors than PUBAX (1.24). BSICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 1006.00 vs. PUBAX (824.00). BSICX (1000) and PUBAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PUBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.46 vs. BSICX (3.49). PUBAX return over 5 years is better than : 15.04 vs. BSICX (9.14).
| BSICX | PUBAX | BSICX / PUBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 1.19 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 1.24 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.756 | 0.931 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48.4B | 2.2B | 2,200% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.76 | 5.17 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.49 | 5.46 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.21 | 21.93 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.14 | 15.04 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.47 | 41.00 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement