BTBT
Price
$2.74
Change
-$0.07 (-2.49%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
880.73M
111 days until earnings call
CANG
Price
$4.87
Change
-$0.04 (-0.81%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
509.85M
4 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BTBT vs CANG

Header iconBTBT vs CANG Comparison
Open Charts BTBT vs CANGBanner chart's image
Bit Digital
Price$2.74
Change-$0.07 (-2.49%)
Volume$10.86M
Capitalization880.73M
Cango
Price$4.87
Change-$0.04 (-0.81%)
Volume$198.71K
Capitalization509.85M
BTBT vs CANG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BTBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTBT vs. CANG commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTBT is a Buy and CANG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BTBT: $2.74 vs. CANG: $4.87)
Brand notoriety: BTBT and CANG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTBT: 24% vs. CANG: 32%
Market capitalization -- BTBT: $880.73M vs. CANG: $509.85M
BTBT [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $880.73M. CANG’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $509.85M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.33B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTBT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCANG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BTBT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CANG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CANG is a better buy in the long-term than BTBT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BTBT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CANG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BTBT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • CANG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CANG is a better buy in the short-term than BTBT.

Price Growth

BTBT (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -0.72% price change this week, while CANG (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +6.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +1.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.39%.

Reported Earning Dates

BTBT is expected to report earnings on Dec 17, 2025.

CANG is expected to report earnings on Sep 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+1.99% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BTBT($881M) has a higher market cap than CANG($510M). BTBT has higher P/E ratio than CANG: BTBT (12.53) vs CANG (11.51). CANG YTD gains are higher at: 10.682 vs. BTBT (-6.485). BTBT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 40.1M vs. CANG (5.02M). CANG has more cash in the bank: 2.52B vs. BTBT (185M). BTBT has less debt than CANG: BTBT (43.7M) vs CANG (834M). CANG has higher revenues than BTBT: CANG (1.79B) vs BTBT (155M).
BTBTCANGBTBT / CANG
Capitalization881M510M173%
EBITDA40.1M5.02M799%
Gain YTD-6.48510.682-61%
P/E Ratio12.5311.51109%
Revenue155M1.79B9%
Total Cash185M2.52B7%
Total Debt43.7M834M5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BTBT vs CANG: Fundamental Ratings
BTBT
CANG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
144
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10067
SMR RATING
1..100
9491
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6138
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1234
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BTBT's Valuation (72) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as CANG (73) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that BTBT’s stock grew similarly to CANG’s over the last 12 months.

CANG's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BTBT (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that CANG’s stock grew somewhat faster than BTBT’s over the last 12 months.

CANG's SMR Rating (91) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as BTBT (94) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that CANG’s stock grew similarly to BTBT’s over the last 12 months.

CANG's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as BTBT (61) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that CANG’s stock grew similarly to BTBT’s over the last 12 months.

BTBT's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as CANG (34) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that BTBT’s stock grew similarly to CANG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTBTCANG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BTBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SROIX13.610.03
+0.22%
Calamos Antetokounmpo Sustainable Eqs I
FIQPX62.28N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Z
COSZX14.21N/A
N/A
Columbia Overseas Value Inst
TEOJX9.99N/A
N/A
Transamerica Emerging Markets Eq I2
PCHSX31.57-0.01
-0.03%
Putnam Global Health Care C

BTBT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BTBT has been closely correlated with WULF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BTBT jumps, then WULF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTBT
1D Price
Change %
BTBT100%
-2.49%
WULF - BTBT
71%
Closely correlated
-1.19%
BITF - BTBT
70%
Closely correlated
+3.08%
IREN - BTBT
70%
Closely correlated
-2.76%
RIOT - BTBT
69%
Closely correlated
-1.02%
HIVE - BTBT
69%
Closely correlated
+3.16%
More

CANG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CANG has been loosely correlated with MARA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CANG jumps, then MARA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CANG
1D Price
Change %
CANG100%
-0.81%
MARA - CANG
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
HUT - CANG
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.70%
BITF - CANG
34%
Loosely correlated
+3.08%
HIVE - CANG
32%
Poorly correlated
+3.16%
BTBT - CANG
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.49%
More