BTDPY
Price
$12.05
Change
+$0.14 (+1.18%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
5.85B
TMHC
Price
$57.19
Change
-$0.90 (-1.55%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
6.51B
46 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BTDPY vs TMHC

Header iconBTDPY vs TMHC Comparison
Open Charts BTDPY vs TMHCBanner chart's image
BARRATT REDROW
Price$12.05
Change+$0.14 (+1.18%)
Volume$7.96K
Capitalization5.85B
Taylor Morrison Home
Price$57.19
Change-$0.90 (-1.55%)
Volume$743.1K
Capitalization6.51B
BTDPY vs TMHC Comparison Chart
Loading...
BTDPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TMHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTDPY vs. TMHC commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTDPY is a Hold and TMHC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BTDPY: $12.05 vs. TMHC: $57.19)
Brand notoriety: BTDPY and TMHC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Homebuilding industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTDPY: 28% vs. TMHC: 75%
Market capitalization -- BTDPY: $5.85B vs. TMHC: $6.51B
BTDPY [@Homebuilding] is valued at $5.85B. TMHC’s [@Homebuilding] market capitalization is $6.51B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Homebuilding] industry ranges from $53.71B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Homebuilding] industry is $7.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTDPY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTMHC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BTDPY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TMHC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BTDPY is a better buy in the long-term than TMHC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BTDPY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TMHC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BTDPY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TMHC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BTDPY is a better buy in the short-term than TMHC.

Price Growth

BTDPY (@Homebuilding) experienced а -2.82% price change this week, while TMHC (@Homebuilding) price change was +1.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Homebuilding industry was +0.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -15.17%.

Reported Earning Dates

TMHC is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Homebuilding (+0.95% weekly)

Homebuilding includes companies residential home construction companies, renovators and repair firms. The companies may be building single-family or multifamily homes, condominiums or mobile homes. Over the five years to 2019, the Home Builders industry is estimated to have grown at an annualized rate of 2.5% to reach $89.4 billion, (including expected growth of 2.6% in 2019), according to a study by IbisWorld. After having suffered one of its worst crises a decade ago during the last macroeconomic recession–which had much of its origins in U.S. real estate – the homebuilding industry has been recovering steadily so far. Higher disposable incomes and improving economic activity have bolstered consumers’ purchases of homes. While revenue of the Home Builders industry remains well below its prerecession high, demand growth estimates show promise.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TMHC($6.51B) has a higher market cap than BTDPY($5.85B). BTDPY has higher P/E ratio than TMHC: BTDPY (21.53) vs TMHC (8.77). BTDPY YTD gains are higher at: 7.719 vs. TMHC (-6.568). TMHC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.12B vs. BTDPY (372M). BTDPY has more cash in the bank: 950M vs. TMHC (799M). BTDPY has less debt than TMHC: BTDPY (246M) vs TMHC (2.1B). TMHC has higher revenues than BTDPY: TMHC (7.42B) vs BTDPY (4.39B).
BTDPYTMHCBTDPY / TMHC
Capitalization5.85B6.51B90%
EBITDA372M1.12B33%
Gain YTD7.719-6.568-118%
P/E Ratio21.538.77246%
Revenue4.39B7.42B59%
Total Cash950M799M119%
Total Debt246M2.1B12%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BTDPY vs TMHC: Fundamental Ratings
BTDPY
TMHC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5071
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8017
SMR RATING
1..100
9152
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5660
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1073
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BTDPY's Valuation (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TMHC (65) in the Homebuilding industry. This means that BTDPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than TMHC’s over the last 12 months.

TMHC's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Homebuilding industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BTDPY (80) in the null industry. This means that TMHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than BTDPY’s over the last 12 months.

TMHC's SMR Rating (52) in the Homebuilding industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BTDPY (91) in the null industry. This means that TMHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than BTDPY’s over the last 12 months.

BTDPY's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as TMHC (60) in the Homebuilding industry. This means that BTDPY’s stock grew similarly to TMHC’s over the last 12 months.

BTDPY's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TMHC (73) in the Homebuilding industry. This means that BTDPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than TMHC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTDPYTMHC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BTDPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TMHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GDXD3.170.25
+8.56%
MicroSectors™ Gold Mns 3X Inv Lvrgd ETN
HDLB15.050.29
+1.96%
ETRACS Mny Py 2xLgd US Hg Dv Lw Vl ETN B
PSI54.140.65
+1.22%
Invesco Semiconductors ETF
PIN26.720.29
+1.10%
Invesco India ETF
FSEC42.68-0.33
-0.77%
Fidelity Investment Grade Sec ETF

BTDPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BTDPY has been closely correlated with PSMMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BTDPY jumps, then PSMMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTDPY
1D Price
Change %
BTDPY100%
+1.18%
PSMMY - BTDPY
69%
Closely correlated
-0.39%
PHM - BTDPY
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.39%
TMHC - BTDPY
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.55%
TPH - BTDPY
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.25%
MHO - BTDPY
48%
Loosely correlated
-2.20%
More

TMHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMHC has been closely correlated with MTH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TMHC jumps, then MTH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TMHC
1D Price
Change %
TMHC100%
-1.55%
MTH - TMHC
90%
Closely correlated
-1.90%
PHM - TMHC
89%
Closely correlated
-1.39%
KBH - TMHC
89%
Closely correlated
-2.51%
MHO - TMHC
88%
Closely correlated
-2.20%
CCS - TMHC
87%
Closely correlated
-1.95%
More