BUD vs SAM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUD is a Hold and SAM is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BUD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSAM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- BUD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SAM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BUD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BUD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SAM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
BUD (@Beverages: Alcoholic) experienced а -6.03% price change this week, while SAM (@Beverages: Alcoholic) price change was -3.89% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Alcoholic industry was -1.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.23%.
Reported Earning Dates
BUD is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.
SAM is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Beverages: Alcoholic (-1.80% weekly)The alcoholic beverage market includes beer, wine, and spirits. From $230 billion in 2015, the industry has grown to around $250 billion by 2019. In recent years, alcoholic beverage makers have been looking to expand distribution and purchase channels, such as through online stores (e.g. e-commerce platform Drizly) and convenience stores. Anheuser-Busch In Bev and Diageo are major global alcoholic beverage companies, while U.S.-owned companies include Constellation Brands and Brown-Forman Corp. among several others.
| BUD | SAM | BUD / SAM | |
| Capitalization | 120B | 3.66B | 3,278% |
| EBITDA | 19.1B | 210M | 9,095% |
| Gain YTD | -21.151 | -12.390 | 171% |
| P/E Ratio | 23.50 | 48.42 | 49% |
| Revenue | 59.4B | 2.01B | 2,957% |
| Total Cash | 10.4B | 298M | 3,490% |
| Total Debt | 78.2B | 45.3M | 172,627% |
BUD | SAM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 52 | 57 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 43 Fair valued | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 77 | 77 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | 76 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BUD's Valuation (43) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAM (87). This means that BUD’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAM’s over the last 12 months.
BUD's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as SAM (100). This means that BUD’s stock grew similarly to SAM’s over the last 12 months.
BUD's SMR Rating (77) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as SAM (77). This means that BUD’s stock grew similarly to SAM’s over the last 12 months.
SAM's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as BUD (80). This means that SAM’s stock grew similarly to BUD’s over the last 12 months.
SAM's P/E Growth Rating (76) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as BUD (84). This means that SAM’s stock grew similarly to BUD’s over the last 12 months.
| BUD | SAM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 5 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 28 days ago 53% | 18 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | 7 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 68% |
BUD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUD has been loosely correlated with BUDFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUD jumps, then BUDFF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUD | 100% | +0.22% | ||
| BUDFF - BUD | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.86% | ||
| DEO - BUD | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.39% | ||
| HKHHY - BUD | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| HEINY - BUD | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.39% | ||
| PRNDY - BUD | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.35% | ||
More | ||||
SAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAM has been loosely correlated with TAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SAM jumps, then TAP could also see price increases.