Advertisement
BULD vs KLAC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BULD is a Hold and KLAC is a Hold.
KLAC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 64 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 13 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 7 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 20 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 22 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| BULD | KLAC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 24 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 6 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 79% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| LITP | 11.76 | 0.05 | +0.46% |
| Sprott Lithium Miners ETF | |||
| WTMF | 37.45 | 0.07 | +0.19% |
| WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy ETF | |||
| TBUX | 49.90 | N/A | N/A |
| T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF | |||
| PQJA | 28.34 | N/A | N/A |
| PGIM NASDAQ-100 BUFFER 12 ETF - JANUARY | |||
| IYW | 193.37 | -2.97 | -1.51% |
| iShares US Technology ETF | |||
BULD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BULD has been closely correlated with ASML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BULD jumps, then ASML could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BULD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BULD | 100% | -1.04% | ||
| ASML - BULD | 80% Closely correlated | -1.56% | ||
| LRCX - BULD | 78% Closely correlated | -2.86% | ||
| KLAC - BULD | 76% Closely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| AMAT - BULD | 76% Closely correlated | -1.57% | ||
| TER - BULD | 74% Closely correlated | -2.22% | ||
More | ||||
KLAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KLAC has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KLAC jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KLAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KLAC | 100% | -0.94% | ||
| LRCX - KLAC | 91% Closely correlated | -2.86% | ||
| AMAT - KLAC | 89% Closely correlated | -1.57% | ||
| ASML - KLAC | 81% Closely correlated | -1.56% | ||
| ADI - KLAC | 79% Closely correlated | +0.08% | ||
| QCOM - KLAC | 77% Closely correlated | -1.01% | ||
More | ||||