KLAC
Price
$210.52
Change
-$8.21 (-3.75%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
275B
3 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QCOM
Price
$166.97
Change
-$4.14 (-2.42%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
175.99B
11 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

KLAC vs QCOM

KLAC vs QCOM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 19, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? KLA Corporation (KLAC) vs. QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • KLAC and QCOM both operate in the semiconductor ecosystem but occupy fundamentally different positions — KLAC supplies the equipment that makes chips, while QCOM designs and sells the chips themselves alongside licensing intellectual property.
  • KLAC has delivered significantly stronger price momentum over the past year, returning roughly 128% compared to QCOM's approximately 15%, driven by the AI infrastructure buildout and surging demand for semiconductor capital equipment.
  • QCOM trades at a much lower valuation multiple — a trailing P/E (price-to-earnings ratio) of roughly 18 versus KLAC's P/E near 60 — reflecting different growth profiles and market perceptions of each company's cyclical exposure.
  • Both stocks have experienced notable volatility in recent weeks, with KLAC pulling back sharply from its 52-week high and QCOM declining approximately 19% over the past month amid broader semiconductor sector rotation.
  • KLAC benefits from record free cash flow and expanding process control intensity, while QCOM is actively diversifying beyond handsets into automotive and IoT (Internet of Things) segments, which collectively grew 23% year-over-year in its most recent quarter.
  • From a trend-following AI perspective, KLAC's stronger directional momentum and secular tailwinds from AI-driven wafer fabrication equipment (WFE) spending give it an edge, though its elevated valuation introduces greater downside risk.

Introduction

Investors navigating the semiconductor landscape often find themselves weighing pure-play equipment suppliers against diversified chip designers. KLAC (KLA Corporation) and QCOM (QUALCOMM Incorporated) represent two distinct approaches to capturing value in this rapidly evolving sector. KLA Corporation provides the essential process control and yield management tools that semiconductor manufacturers rely on to produce advanced chips, while QUALCOMM designs wireless chipsets and monetizes one of the industry's most valuable patent portfolios. This comparison is particularly relevant for investors seeking to understand how different segments of the semiconductor value chain are performing amid the ongoing AI infrastructure expansion, shifting trade policies, and evolving end-market demand.

KLAC Overview and Recent Performance

KLAC, headquartered in Milpitas, California, is the dominant global provider of semiconductor process control and yield management solutions. The company's inspection and metrology systems are critical for detecting microscopic defects during chip manufacturing, and its tools become increasingly essential as chip architectures grow more complex. KLA completed a ten-for-one forward stock split in mid-June, reflecting management's confidence after a period of extraordinary share price appreciation. Over the past year, KLAC shares have advanced approximately 128%, propelled by robust wafer fabrication equipment spending tied to AI infrastructure demands.

In recent weeks, however, KLAC has experienced significant turbulence. After reaching a 52-week high above $307 in late June, the stock pulled back sharply as broader AI and semiconductor names faced a rotation. Insider selling activity — including a roughly $7.36 million sale by CFO Bren Higgins — drew market attention, though these transactions were conducted under pre-established trading plans. On the fundamental side, KLA's most recently reported quarter delivered revenue of $3.42 billion, up 11.5% year-over-year, while non-GAAP diluted EPS of $9.40 exceeded analyst expectations. The company's advanced packaging revenue has surged to an annualized run rate near $1 billion, reflecting booming demand for AI accelerators and high-bandwidth memory. Moody's recently affirmed KLA's A2 credit rating and revised its outlook to positive, citing expectations for mid-to-upper-teens annual revenue growth.

QCOM Overview and Recent Performance

QCOM, based in San Diego, California, is a global leader in wireless technology and semiconductor solutions. The company's QCT (Qualcomm CDMA Technologies) segment designs and sells chips for smartphones, automotive systems, and IoT devices, while its QTL (Qualcomm Technology Licensing) segment generates high-margin revenue from its extensive patent portfolio. Qualcomm's most recent quarterly report showed revenue of $10.4 billion, a 10% year-over-year increase, with non-GAAP EPS of $2.77 rising 19% over the same period. Automotive revenue reached a record $984 million, growing 21%, and IoT revenue climbed 24% — together demonstrating meaningful progress in the company's long-standing diversification strategy away from smartphone dependency.

Despite solid operational results, QCOM shares have faced headwinds in recent weeks, declining approximately 19% over the past month. The stock's trailing P/E ratio of roughly 18 makes it notably less expensive than many semiconductor peers, yet the market appears to be weighing several concerns: the mature smartphone market's slower growth trajectory, ongoing U.S.-China trade friction affecting both chip sales and licensing revenue, and competitive pressure from rivals such as MediaTek. On the strategic front, Qualcomm announced a planned $2.4 billion acquisition of Alphawave IP Group, aiming to strengthen its position in data center and connectivity chips. The company also returned $3.8 billion to shareholders during its most recent quarter through dividends and buybacks, maintaining its commitment to distributing 100% of free cash flow.

Trending AI Robots

For traders seeking a data-driven edge in comparing and trading stocks like KLAC and QCOM, Tickeron offers a curated Trending AI Robots page. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI-powered trading bots, each designed to trade specific tickers using distinct strategies, timeframes, and risk parameters. Rather than overwhelming users with every available bot, the Trending AI Robots section highlights only those that have demonstrated the strongest alignment with current market conditions. These bots span a range of trading styles — from short-term momentum strategies to longer-duration trend-following approaches — and their performance statistics, including win rates, average trade duration, and drawdown metrics, are transparently displayed. Some featured bots have achieved annualized returns well above broader market benchmarks, though results naturally vary by strategy and market regime. Exploring this curated selection can help investors identify AI-driven approaches that match their trading objectives. Visit the Trending AI Robots page to review the latest top-performing bots.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The most fundamental distinction between KLAC and QCOM lies in their positions within the semiconductor value chain. KLA Corporation is a capital equipment supplier — its revenue depends on chip manufacturers' willingness to invest in new fabrication capacity and advanced process control tools. This makes KLAC highly sensitive to WFE spending cycles, which are currently in a strong upswing driven by AI-related demand. QUALCOMM, by contrast, is a product and licensing company whose fortunes are tied more directly to end-market device sales, particularly smartphones, alongside its growing automotive and IoT segments.

On valuation, the contrast is stark. KLAC trades at approximately 60 times trailing earnings, reflecting investor confidence that AI-driven process control intensity will sustain above-trend growth for years. QCOM's trailing P/E of roughly 18 reflects more tempered expectations, with the market pricing in the maturing handset cycle and regulatory uncertainties. KLAC's gross margin of about 61% and net margin near 36% are impressive, though QCOM's licensing segment generates margins above 70%, giving it a different kind of profitability profile. In terms of shareholder returns, QCOM offers a substantially higher dividend yield of approximately 2.1% compared to KLAC's 0.4%, though KLAC has been more aggressive with share buybacks — including a $7 billion repurchase authorization. Risk factors diverge as well: KLAC faces concentration risk from its reliance on a relatively small number of large semiconductor manufacturers and geopolitical exposure to China, which accounts for roughly 30% of revenue. QCOM confronts competitive erosion risk in handsets and the ongoing possibility of licensing revenue disruption from trade restrictions.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, sector-level catalysts, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI-driven analytical framework would likely express a near-term preference for KLAC over QCOM. KLA Corporation benefits from a clearly defined and expanding role in the AI infrastructure buildout, with secular demand for process control tools rising as chip architectures grow more complex. The company's market share gains — it now commands roughly 7.5 times the process control revenue of its nearest competitor — provide a durable competitive moat. However, this preference comes with a significant caveat: KLAC's elevated valuation multiples and recent insider selling activity suggest that the risk-reward profile has shifted. QCOM, with its lower valuation, strong free cash flow generation, and expanding automotive and IoT segments, may offer a more balanced risk profile for investors who prioritize valuation discipline. The AI verdict, expressed in probabilistic terms, would favor KLAC for trend consistency and catalyst strength, while acknowledging that QCOM's diversification and valuation support a more defensive posture in the event of a semiconductor sector downturn.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
KLAC vs. QCOM commentary
Jul 26, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLAC is a Hold and QCOM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2026
Stock price -- (KLAC: $210.52 vs. QCOM: $166.97)
Brand notoriety: KLAC and QCOM are both notable
KLAC represents the Electronic Production Equipment, while QCOM is part of the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KLAC: 66% vs. QCOM: 35%
Market capitalization -- KLAC: $275B vs. QCOM: $175.99B
KLAC [@Electronic Production Equipment] is valued at $275B. QCOM’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $175.99B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry ranges from $690.05B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $5.01T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry is $67.22B. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $184.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KLAC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileQCOM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • KLAC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • QCOM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, KLAC is a better buy in the long-term than QCOM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KLAC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QCOM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KLAC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • QCOM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QCOM is a better buy in the short-term than KLAC.

Price Growth

KLAC (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а -1.05% price change this week, while QCOM (@Semiconductors) price change was -2.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was -0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -16.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.72%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was -1.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -15.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +36.88%.

Reported Earning Dates

KLAC is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.

QCOM is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Production Equipment (-0.34% weekly)

The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.

@Semiconductors (-1.99% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KLAC($275B) has a higher market cap than QCOM($176B). KLAC has higher P/E ratio than QCOM: KLAC (59.62) vs QCOM (17.95). KLAC YTD gains are higher at: 78.030 vs. QCOM (-1.396). QCOM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 14B vs. KLAC (6.06B). QCOM has more cash in the bank: 9.8B vs. KLAC (613M). KLAC has less debt than QCOM: KLAC (6.15B) vs QCOM (15.3B). QCOM has higher revenues than KLAC: QCOM (44.5B) vs KLAC (13.1B).
KLACQCOMKLAC / QCOM
Capitalization275B176B156%
EBITDA6.06B14B43%
Gain YTD78.030-1.396-5,591%
P/E Ratio59.6217.95332%
Revenue13.1B44.5B29%
Total Cash613M9.8B6%
Total Debt6.15B15.3B40%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KLAC vs QCOM: Fundamental Ratings
KLAC
QCOM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7053
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2373
SMR RATING
1..100
1327
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3754
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1337
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QCOM's Valuation (40) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KLAC (90) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that QCOM’s stock grew somewhat faster than KLAC’s over the last 12 months.

KLAC's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QCOM (73) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that KLAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than QCOM’s over the last 12 months.

KLAC's SMR Rating (13) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as QCOM (27) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that KLAC’s stock grew similarly to QCOM’s over the last 12 months.

KLAC's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as QCOM (54) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that KLAC’s stock grew similarly to QCOM’s over the last 12 months.

KLAC's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as QCOM (37) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that KLAC’s stock grew similarly to QCOM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KLACQCOM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KLAC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QCOM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ESLA0.780.02
+2.04%
Estrella Immunopharma
KO82.251.08
+1.33%
Coca-Cola Company
CELH27.12-0.05
-0.18%
Celsius Holdings
SEPN33.10-0.37
-1.11%
Septerna Inc
HRZN4.31-0.10
-2.27%
Horizon Technology Finance Corp

QCOM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QCOM has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QCOM jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QCOM
1D Price
Change %
QCOM100%
-2.42%
LRCX - QCOM
80%
Closely correlated
-4.56%
KLAC - QCOM
78%
Closely correlated
-3.75%
AMKR - QCOM
76%
Closely correlated
-0.57%
AMAT - QCOM
74%
Closely correlated
-4.72%
KLIC - QCOM
74%
Closely correlated
-4.48%
More