The RSI Oscillator for BURL moved out of oversold territory on September 21, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 24 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 23 of the 24 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 90%.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 4 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a +1.62% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where BURL advanced for three days, in 219 of 305 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 72%.
BURL may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 181 of 250 cases where BURL Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 72%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 13, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on BURL as a result. In 64 of 95 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 67%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for BURL turned negative on October 21, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 42 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 31 of the 42 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 74%.
The 50-day moving average for BURL moved below the 200-day moving average on September 25, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where BURL declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 67%.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 25 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 25 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 73 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: BURL's P/B Ratio (7.925) is slightly higher than the industry average of (1.839). P/E Ratio (22.238) is within average values for comparable stocks, (12.245). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.955) is also within normal values, averaging (0.517). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.064) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.212) is also within normal values, averaging (0.652).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 73 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. BURL’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 76 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. BURL’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 86, placing this stock worse than average.
The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an uptrend is expected.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 7 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a +3.69% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where JEM advanced for three days, in 38 of 45 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 84%.
JEM may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where JEM declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
The Aroon Indicator for JEM entered a downward trend on October 22, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 28 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.395) is normal, around the industry mean (1.839). P/E Ratio (-0.006) is within average values for comparable stocks, (12.245). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (0.517). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.064) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.043) is also within normal values, averaging (0.652).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 94 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. JEM’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 97 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 99 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. JEM’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 86, placing this stock worse than average.
BURL | JEM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 85 | 56 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 73 Overvalued | 28 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 25 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 73 | 94 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 25 | 26 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
JEM's Valuation (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BURL (73) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry. This means that JEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than BURL’s over the last 12 months.
JEM's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BURL (100) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry. This means that JEM’s stock grew similarly to BURL’s over the last 12 months.
BURL's SMR Rating (25) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is significantly better than the same rating for JEM (99) in the null industry. This means that BURL’s stock grew significantly faster than JEM’s over the last 12 months.
BURL's Price Growth Rating (73) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is in the same range as JEM (94) in the null industry. This means that BURL’s stock grew similarly to JEM’s over the last 12 months.
BURL's P/E Growth Rating (76) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is in the same range as JEM (97) in the null industry. This means that BURL’s stock grew similarly to JEM’s over the last 12 months.
| BURL | JEM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 72% | 17 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 1 day ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 90% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BURL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while JEM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BURL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JEM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
BURL (@Apparel/Footwear Retail) experienced а -5.66% price change this week, while JEM (@Apparel/Footwear Retail) price change was -11.22% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear Retail industry was -2.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.35%.
BURL is expected to report earnings on Nov 24, 2026.
Companies in the apparel and/or footwear retail industry sell clothing, accessories and footwear, for different age groups and genders. The industry’s product categories could range from basics, such as underwear, to luxury items. Some retailers source items from wholesalers or an apparel brand to sell in their stores; some others are licensed to make and market their own retail goods under particular brands. Several companies outsource production of clothing to developing/emerging economies where labor costs are relatively inexpensive. Apparel retail is often influenced by fashion trends, and many companies feel the need to adapt to what’s “in vogue” to retain customers and attract new ones. A major disruption in this industry has been the burgeoning trend in digital shopping – to compete with rapidly growing e-commerce, even traditional retail players are upping the ante on their online platforms. Much of the products’ performance in apparel/footwear retail is cyclical, i.e., economic boom times encourage consumer spending, while recessions induce thriftiness among people. Some large-cap U.S. apparel/footwear retail companies include TJX Companies Inc., Ross Stores, Inc., Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Burlington Stores, Inc.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BURL has been loosely correlated with ROST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BURL jumps, then ROST could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BURL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BURL | 100% | +1.81% | ||
| ROST - BURL | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.06% | ||
| TJX - BURL | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.28% | ||
| DBI - BURL | 41% Loosely correlated | +8.26% | ||
| SHOE - BURL | 34% Loosely correlated | +7.56% | ||
| CAL - BURL | 32% Poorly correlated | +4.95% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor tells us that JEM and CURV have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JEM and CURV's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JEM | 100% | -2.97% | ||
| CURV - JEM | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.83% | ||
| BRIA - JEM | 20% Poorly correlated | +3.60% | ||
| GAP - JEM | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.97% | ||
| BURL - JEM | 8% Poorly correlated | +1.81% | ||
| LVLU - JEM | 6% Poorly correlated | +3.67% | ||
More | ||||