BUSE
Price
$30.29
Change
+$0.54 (+1.82%)
Updated
Jul 28, 01:32 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.51B
Earnings call today
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CIVB
Price
$29.39
Change
+$0.75 (+2.62%)
Updated
Jul 28, 01:43 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
595.03M
87 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BUSE vs CIVB

BUSE vs CIVB Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BUSE vs. CIVB commentary
Jul 28, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUSE is a Hold and CIVB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2026
Stock price -- (BUSE: $29.75 vs. CIVB: $28.65)
Brand notoriety: BUSE and CIVB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BUSE: 71% vs. CIVB: 51%
Market capitalization -- BUSE: $2.51B vs. CIVB: $595.03M
BUSE [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.51B. CIVB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $595.03M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BUSE’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCIVB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BUSE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CIVB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CIVB is a better buy in the long-term than BUSE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BUSE’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CIVB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BUSE’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CIVB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CIVB is a better buy in the short-term than BUSE.

Price Growth

BUSE (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.09% price change this week, while CIVB (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

BUSE is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.

CIVB is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.70% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BUSE($2.51B) has a higher market cap than CIVB($595M). BUSE has higher P/E ratio than CIVB: BUSE (12.23) vs CIVB (10.68). CIVB YTD gains are higher at: 30.834 vs. BUSE (28.713). CIVB has less debt than BUSE: CIVB (209M) vs BUSE (506M). BUSE has higher revenues than CIVB: BUSE (791M) vs CIVB (176M).
BUSECIVBBUSE / CIVB
Capitalization2.51B595M423%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD28.71330.83493%
P/E Ratio12.2310.68115%
Revenue791M176M449%
Total Cash169MN/A-
Total Debt506M209M242%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BUSE vs CIVB: Fundamental Ratings
BUSE
CIVB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8544
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4948
SMR RATING
1..100
3659
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4241
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8423
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BUSE's Valuation (24) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CIVB (32). This means that BUSE’s stock grew similarly to CIVB’s over the last 12 months.

CIVB's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BUSE (49). This means that CIVB’s stock grew similarly to BUSE’s over the last 12 months.

BUSE's SMR Rating (36) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CIVB (59). This means that BUSE’s stock grew similarly to CIVB’s over the last 12 months.

CIVB's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BUSE (42). This means that CIVB’s stock grew similarly to BUSE’s over the last 12 months.

CIVB's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BUSE (84). This means that CIVB’s stock grew somewhat faster than BUSE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BUSECIVB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
62%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BUSE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CIVB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VALLX44.630.23
+0.52%
Value Line Larger Companies Focused Inv
DFVIX27.600.06
+0.22%
DFA International Value III
VMGAX842.25N/A
N/A
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth Index Instl
BVEFX23.03N/A
N/A
Becker Equity Fund Retail
UGLSX58.79N/A
N/A
JHancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth R6

BUSE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUSE has been closely correlated with PRK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BUSE jumps, then PRK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BUSE
1D Price
Change %
BUSE100%
-0.34%
PRK - BUSE
88%
Closely correlated
+0.41%
EFSC - BUSE
86%
Closely correlated
-0.50%
TRMK - BUSE
86%
Closely correlated
-0.64%
FULT - BUSE
86%
Closely correlated
-0.69%
SRCE - BUSE
85%
Closely correlated
+1.11%
More