BUSE
Price
$29.85
Change
+$0.29 (+0.98%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
2.52B
3 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FULT
Price
$24.57
Change
+$0.31 (+1.28%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
4.7B
87 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BUSE vs FULT

BUSE vs FULT Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BUSE vs. FULT commentary
Jul 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUSE is a Hold and FULT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 25, 2026
Stock price -- (BUSE: $29.56 vs. FULT: $24.26)
Brand notoriety: BUSE and FULT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BUSE: 69% vs. FULT: 78%
Market capitalization -- BUSE: $2.52B vs. FULT: $4.7B
BUSE [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.52B. FULT’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BUSE’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFULT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BUSE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FULT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the long-term than BUSE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BUSE’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FULT’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BUSE’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FULT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BUSE is a better buy in the short-term than FULT.

Price Growth

BUSE (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.80% price change this week, while FULT (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

BUSE is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.

FULT is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.54% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FULT($4.7B) has a higher market cap than BUSE($2.52B). BUSE (12.28) and FULT (11.81) have similar P/E ratio . FULT (27.690) and BUSE (26.766) have similar YTD gains . FULT has more cash in the bank: 312M vs. BUSE (169M). BUSE has less debt than FULT: BUSE (506M) vs FULT (1.25B). FULT has higher revenues than BUSE: FULT (1.33B) vs BUSE (791M).
BUSEFULTBUSE / FULT
Capitalization2.52B4.7B54%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD26.76627.69097%
P/E Ratio12.2811.81104%
Revenue791M1.33B60%
Total Cash169M312M54%
Total Debt506M1.25B40%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BUSE vs FULT: Fundamental Ratings
BUSE
FULT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8875
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5335
SMR RATING
1..100
3623
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4342
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8444
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BUSE's Valuation (24) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (28). This means that BUSE’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BUSE (53). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to BUSE’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's SMR Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BUSE (36). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to BUSE’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BUSE (43). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to BUSE’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BUSE (84). This means that FULT’s stock grew somewhat faster than BUSE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BUSEFULT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BUSE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FULT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GLU19.510.04
+0.20%
Gabelli Utility & Income Trust (The)
CRED23.28N/A
N/A
Columbia Research Enhanced Rl Estt ETF
DVXB28.31N/A
N/A
WEBs Materials XLB Defined Vol ETF
XVV56.18-0.83
-1.46%
iShares ESG Select Screened S&P 500 ETF
ESGV130.06-2.19
-1.66%
Vanguard ESG US Stock ETF

BUSE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUSE has been closely correlated with PRK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BUSE jumps, then PRK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BUSE
1D Price
Change %
BUSE100%
-0.14%
PRK - BUSE
88%
Closely correlated
-0.69%
EFSC - BUSE
86%
Closely correlated
-0.97%
SRCE - BUSE
86%
Closely correlated
+0.41%
FULT - BUSE
86%
Closely correlated
-0.74%
TRMK - BUSE
85%
Closely correlated
-0.32%
More

FULT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FULT has been closely correlated with ASB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FULT jumps, then ASB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FULT
1D Price
Change %
FULT100%
-0.74%
ASB - FULT
89%
Closely correlated
-1.43%
ONB - FULT
89%
Closely correlated
-1.06%
UBSI - FULT
88%
Closely correlated
+0.96%
UCB - FULT
88%
Closely correlated
-0.29%
AUB - FULT
88%
Closely correlated
-0.43%
More