BUSE
Price
$29.64
Change
-$0.07 (-0.24%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
2.45B
33 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CVBF
Price
$22.01
Change
-$0.15 (-0.68%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
3.9B
34 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BUSE vs CVBF

BUSE vs CVBF Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BUSE vs. CVBF commentary
Sep 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUSE is a StrongBuy and CVBF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BUSE vs CVBF: Fundamental Ratings
BUSE
CVBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9012
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4475
SMR RATING
1..100
1517
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4447
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8528
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BUSE's Valuation (26) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CVBF (57). This means that BUSE’s stock grew similarly to CVBF’s over the last 12 months.

BUSE's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CVBF (75). This means that BUSE’s stock grew similarly to CVBF’s over the last 12 months.

BUSE's SMR Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CVBF (17). This means that BUSE’s stock grew similarly to CVBF’s over the last 12 months.

BUSE's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CVBF (47). This means that BUSE’s stock grew similarly to CVBF’s over the last 12 months.

CVBF's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BUSE (85). This means that CVBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BUSE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BUSECVBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 24, 2026
Stock price -- (BUSE: $29.64 vs. CVBF: $22.01)
Brand notoriety: BUSE and CVBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BUSE: 92% vs. CVBF: 108%
Market capitalization -- BUSE: $2.45B vs. CVBF: $3.9B
BUSE [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.45B. CVBF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $22.65 to $172.4B. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BUSE’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while CVBF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BUSE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CVBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BUSE is a better buy in the long-term than CVBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BUSE’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CVBF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BUSE’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CVBF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CVBF is a better buy in the short-term than BUSE.

Price Growth

BUSE (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.98% price change this week, while CVBF (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

BUSE is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.

CVBF is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-2.05% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

View a ticker or compare two or three
BUSE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CVBF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ABI24.52-0.05
-0.20%
VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF (ABI)
XYLD41.55-0.09
-0.22%
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD)
QBKV27.05-0.27
-0.98%
AllianzIM U.S. Small Cap Buffer5 ETF (QBKV)
IMOM40.71-0.49
-1.19%
Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM)
GLIX25.66-0.37
-1.41%
Lazard Listed Infrastructure ETF (GLIX)

BUSE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUSE has been closely correlated with EFSC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BUSE jumps, then EFSC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BUSE
1D Price
Change %
BUSE100%
-0.83%
EFSC - BUSE
86%
Closely correlated
-0.97%
SHBI - BUSE
85%
Closely correlated
-0.82%
BY - BUSE
85%
Closely correlated
-1.25%
FULT - BUSE
85%
Closely correlated
-1.12%
CVBF - BUSE
85%
Closely correlated
-1.20%
More